Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

What about DDos and Bot protection ?

About DDoS protection we're fine, we won't have problems!

About bot protections we currently don't have any bot protection

 

Meh,wasnt worth de time xping a dagga in a beta version, excuse moi :)

Why?

Edited by Xerien
Posted

so you think that your booters/stressers ( if you have and really tested them on your server ) are better than the rest of the community ?

If you want you can give a try to test it by yourself.

We managed to get it down with a very strong DDoS which i don't believe that someone would give that money for those booters and it was down for 10 seconds (almost 5 ppl got dc, others was inside w/o problems) and his ip got blocked and couldn't DDoS again.

If you manage to get us down i'm gonna give you my whole server

Posted (edited)

 

If you manage to get us down i'm gonna give you my whole server

 

ooo boy ooo boy ooo boy...

 

i wonder what 4chan users think about it... maybe we should ask them...

 

this is gonna be so much fun:)

Edited by spellspirit
Posted

ooo boy ooo boy ooo boy...

 

i wonder what 4chan users think about it... maybe we should ask them...

 

this is gonna be so much fun:)

give a try!

if you manage to get us down for more than an hour you got my whole server including web/sources/everything.

Posted

give a try!

if you manage to get us down for more than an hour you got my whole server including web/sources/everything.

 

Maybe someone make a book about you....

Its gonna be a sad story about a boy who tought he can chalenge the power of the internet:)

Posted

Maybe someone make a book about you....

Its gonna be a sad story about a boy who tought he can chalenge the power of the internet:)

he will need to pay a lot of money to get a booter to get us down, if he manage to get this booter, than it will be a success for me ;)

 if you know what i mean!

Posted

The pack you use is brazilian or smth?   #1Player Derrotou #2Player instead of:

                                                                #1Player has killed #2Player.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
    • ## [1.4.1] - 2026-01-29   ### ✨ New Features - **Short Description**: Server owners can add a short tagline (up to 240 characters) on the server info page, under the "Online" status. It appears in the server list (By Votes) for VIP, Gold VIP, and Pinned servers so players see a brief summary at a glance.   ### 🔄 Improvements - **Server Info Page**: Description field is limited to 3000 characters with a character counter; the textarea is vertically resizable. A second **Save Changes** button was added at the bottom (after the description) for easier saving. - **Server Name**: In My Servers → Edit, the server name is read-only and can no longer be changed (avoids accidental changes and naming conflicts). - **Server Rows (By Votes)**: Short descriptions wrap correctly and no longer affect row height; long text is clipped to two lines so the list stays tidy and consistent.   ---
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..