Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dear maxcheaters community,

 

The user named tnt1 with skype name xxxtntxxx3 is a virus spreader if he adds you on skype and send you an image dont download it. I will post proofs within 8 hours  but be careful!

 

 

 

With respect,

Maxushost

Posted (edited)

he send me an image yestarday and i didn't had any problem and my antivirus didn't show anythinhg :/

scan the image on -> https://www.virustotal.com/an post here the results

 

 

 

 

 

1212121212.jpg

Edited by `NeverMore
Posted

0/50 dont think so

SHA256: 3a9fb592865305192a05ef7ea45cc08ee29e44d9bc9b9ea14b6520f71ff5155f File name: بدون عنوان.bmp Detection ratio: 0 / 57
Posted

This guy had added me because he has a client for my hosting services. I Didnt downloaded the image since he told me that the client's info are inside there and he refused to upload the image on tinypic. You people that you downloaded the image be carefull because there are many crypters on other forums and anyone can inject your pc without antivirus detect it.

Posted

This guy had added me because he has a client for my hosting services. I Didnt downloaded the image since he told me that the client's info are inside there and he refused to upload the image on tinypic. You people that you downloaded the image be carefull because there are many crypters on other forums and anyone can inject your pc without antivirus detect it.

So it's possible to have been keylogger victim from png files?

Posted (edited)

dont tell me its that guy

hows his name...

 

HighClass

 

:happyforever:  :happyforever:  :happyforever:  :happyforever:  :happyforever:  :happyforever:

 

 

106adb7e4a7279e8d9244840a5b680c9.png

 

449d4793816a723f8afba23acf72ffeb.png

Edited by Karasu
Posted

dont tell me its that guy

hows his name...

 

HighClass

 

:happyforever:  :happyforever:  :happyforever:  :happyforever:  :happyforever:  :happyforever:

 

 

106adb7e4a7279e8d9244840a5b680c9.png

449d4793816a723f8afba23acf72ffeb.png

Is he files are keylogger?

Posted (edited)

Is he files are keylogger?

 

no

he is the one who is muslim

 

 "scammer too"

106adb7e4a7279e8d9244840a5b680c9.png

 

449d4793816a723f8afba23acf72ffeb.png

Edited by Karasu
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..