Jump to content

Regarding a server Feature  

17 members have voted

  1. 1. Does this sounds cool?



Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Well as you know I am l2ewpvp project leader , and I need community's opinion.

 

The feature is:

 

You target a player and press .inspect  then you can see his items/enchant level on items/full inventory

No stats/dyes/other stuff.

You can press .inspectoff and nobody can inspect you!

 

Is that nice to implement or no? And why?

Edited by Ayami-
Posted

Well, I have the same thing in my mind and I will do it later.. :)

 

Basically, don't create any extra code, only use existing packets. Tip - alt+g ;)

Posted (edited)

well is it for security reasons? Because I can do the same without using an existing packet.

 

command will be for players and only

Edited by Ayami-
Posted

well is it for security reasons? Because I can do the same without using an existing packet.

 

command will be for players and only

It will be cleaner to use the packet if you want to show only player's inventory.

Posted

It will be cleaner to use the packet if you want to show only player's inventory.

Well thanks for the tip, but basicly i want some votes if this sounds cool

Posted (edited)

Well thanks for the tip, but basicly i want some votes if this sounds cool

You can also create a command that alows the players to prevent the inspection of their inventory, so everyone will be happy :lol:

Edited by Tessa
Posted

You can also create a command that alows the players to prevent the inspection of their inventory, so everyone will be happy :lol:

Perfect idea! just perfect!

Posted

GMViewItemList, that's a 10 lines to implement.

 

About if it's ok or not, I guess it's now a basic feature of actual MMOs. No true downfall, except best pvpers stuff will be copied pasted (but well it's not like there were 4 different sets with almost forced dyes and a single set of jewels).

Posted

Dyes are not visible and nobody can copy since there is a command that you cant be inspected. Thanks for your reply tryskell.

Regards

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Thats stupid. You wanna create smth like IG nWatch but why? For a proof that u aint corrupted? There many ways to hide OP items. If you ask me thats useless.

Edited by raF

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
    • ## [1.4.1] - 2026-01-29   ### ✨ New Features - **Short Description**: Server owners can add a short tagline (up to 240 characters) on the server info page, under the "Online" status. It appears in the server list (By Votes) for VIP, Gold VIP, and Pinned servers so players see a brief summary at a glance.   ### 🔄 Improvements - **Server Info Page**: Description field is limited to 3000 characters with a character counter; the textarea is vertically resizable. A second **Save Changes** button was added at the bottom (after the description) for easier saving. - **Server Name**: In My Servers → Edit, the server name is read-only and can no longer be changed (avoids accidental changes and naming conflicts). - **Server Rows (By Votes)**: Short descriptions wrap correctly and no longer affect row height; long text is clipped to two lines so the list stays tidy and consistent.   ---
    • @Celestine  sorry for mu question , and post it's to old but i want to ask  ?   do you have uncrypted interface x dat of this interface? i want to add custom autofarm button but when i open it with xdat say file seems  to be  encrypted. thanks!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..