Jump to content
MaxCheaters Official Group on Discord
Top.MaxCheaters.com is now OPEN – Lineage 2 Top Listing

high five Anti Bot For H5 Client

Frank

By Frank
in Marketplace [L2Packs & Files]

 Share

Recommended Posts

Frank Enthusiast

Frank

Posted
Posted

Protect your server from bots and auto clickers with a few bucks! No reason to pay a fortune to lameguard or any other outdated project in order to protect your server from 3rd party programs! We provide protection against all well known programs bots and autoclickers and we can add more after requests.

 

Prices: 

25e per IP (Protected from: L2phx, l2tow, l2walker)

 

If you're interested in buying the antibot source and build your own project, you have to contact me in private (PM) cause price is negotiable.

 

Thanks

 

mcbigmac Newbie

mcbigmac

Posted
Posted (edited)

So in other words "it's totally cool and works and is cheap and is unique" - but you can't provide a public test.

You can't explain any features or technical facts about how it works and\or is different from any leaked stuff or current protection offerings.

 

....wtf is wrong with you?

 

 

Ninja Edit:

"We have a local server that is hosted".

 

Do you realize that sentence contradicts itself - or did you hope people would just buy it and not think about it?

Edited by mcbigmac
icshiba Newbie

icshiba

Posted
Posted (edited)

Could you explain us how does it work?

You're providing protection against 3rd programms us you say like "L2Phx,L2Walker,L2Tower"

 

Client/java protection?

 

What's your requirements, what do we have to do? Use your own patch system, your own jar? or what?

I'm talking about the loginserver side.

 

 

 

the only "test" we can do is on a local server which is hosted for testing purposes.

 

No Doubts.

Edited by Nicølas
Frank Enthusiast

Frank

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So in other words "it's totally cool and works and is cheap and is unique" - but you can't provide a public test.

You can't explain any features or technical facts about how it works and\or is different from any leaked stuff or current protection offerings.

 

Public test = You login to my local server using any 3rd program you want. 

 

@Nicolas, I mostly provide client files (.dll), since java side is not that hard to create, but I can help you with both if you want.

mcbigmac Newbie

mcbigmac

Posted
Posted (edited)

I'd like to test it.

 

You don't explain any technical features regarding it - or anything at all.

Ergo - it seems like you haven't actually written anything yourself - but i could be wrong...

Edited by mcbigmac
Frank Enthusiast

Frank

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I'd like to test it.

 

You don't explain any technical features regarding it - or anything at all.

Ergo - it seems like you haven't actually written anything yourself - but i could be wrong...

Send me a PM with your skype and we can make a test.

icshiba Newbie

icshiba

Posted
Posted

 

@Nicolas, I mostly provide client files (.dll), since java side is not that hard to create, but I can help you with both if you want.

 

 

It's not about me, be sure that i know how to protect my server against 3RD Programms :D ,

but your topic is imperfect.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • prostsmm
      Boost Your SEO with Rankopti – Premium Backlinks, Keywords

      By prostsmm · Posted

      NEW UPDATES ! 
    • NeoPacket0041
      HQ Photoshop | Verify Accs KYC, AML | Antiban 100% | PSD Tem

      By NeoPacket0041 · Posted

      LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • Ave
      ⚜ Custom UPDATER / LAUNCHER ⚜

      By Ave · Posted

      IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • Databay
      █ 7,000,000+ RESIDENTIAL PROXIES ✅ FROM 0.65$ / GB █

      By Databay · Posted

      This is a bump: https://databay.com/
    • sandeagle
      CliExt.dll from Guytis IL Projects problem!!!

      By sandeagle · Posted

      i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..