Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dammit... I should probably need the event to have 10 winners in order to have a little chance D: fu! the others are damm good :(

 

Wyatt stay positive man I like yours ;D

Posted

I liked it too till I started looking the others x'D :(

 

That's a mistake :P Don't look at others their work.

For example I'm doing this for years and u just started.

But ur good and got ideas it's all about what other ppl like u make what u like and then they decide ;D

Posted

@Zardanico, you have exceeded the limits you should better fix it or you will disqualified. :)

 

Thanks mate, had to re-do the sig for about 5 times now for being too lazy to read the thread.

Posted

Stupid event. Creator of the event is able to participate in, okay sure. Then people use signatures made by others to win a fucking 'PS Award'. What the hell?

Posted

Stupid event. Creator of the event is able to participate in, okay sure. Then people use signatures made by others to win a -beep-ing 'PS Award'. What the hell?

y,true story...one guy asked me to make him 1 sig so he can participate
Posted

Stupid event. Creator of the event is able to participate in, okay sure. Then people use signatures made by others to win a -beep-ing 'PS Award'. What the hell?

And who cares if the creator of the event participates?

The result of the event comes from a poll where normal users vote for their most liked signature.

 

y,true story...one guy asked me to make him 1 sig so he can participate

I guess when someone requests a signature what only obtains is the signature, not the render, without render -> no participation.

Otherwise yes can be tricky D:

Posted

And who cares if the creator of the event participates?

The result of the event comes from a poll where normal users vote for their most liked signature.

I guess when someone requests a signature what only obtains is the signature, not the render, without render -> no participation.

Otherwise yes can be tricky D:

When you ask from a friend to do it, he can provide the render as well, obviously. And in any other SOTM none of the creators and that means GFX team took part. So why now? Yes, it matters as he is the GFX mod, he will gain votes, The point is to create some competition outside the team, let the simple members take part in it only, like in any event. Easy & simple as that. GFX mods are supposed to be here to help and guide people to the correct direction , help them to develop their skills and get better, not to take part in their own events. That's stupid & pointless!

Posted

Stupid event. Creator of the event is able to participate in, okay sure. Then people use signatures made by others to win a -beep-ing 'PS Award'. What the hell?

 

You think i join for win or what?

I dont look like i need it, i just participate because i want to.

If you show me a rule where staffers cannot participate i will remove my work.

Posted

You think i join for win or what?

I dont look like i need it, i just participate because i want to.

If you show me a rule where staffers cannot participate i will remove my work.

there are no any rule for that cause you are the gfx mod and you can write them or you can delete them.So why you are asking for rules if you are the responsible for that?
Posted

there are no any rule for that cause you are the gfx mod and you can write them or you can delete them.So why you are asking for rules if you are the responsible for that?

 

I was ironic doh...

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
    • ## [1.4.1] - 2026-01-29   ### ✨ New Features - **Short Description**: Server owners can add a short tagline (up to 240 characters) on the server info page, under the "Online" status. It appears in the server list (By Votes) for VIP, Gold VIP, and Pinned servers so players see a brief summary at a glance.   ### 🔄 Improvements - **Server Info Page**: Description field is limited to 3000 characters with a character counter; the textarea is vertically resizable. A second **Save Changes** button was added at the bottom (after the description) for easier saving. - **Server Name**: In My Servers → Edit, the server name is read-only and can no longer be changed (avoids accidental changes and naming conflicts). - **Server Rows (By Votes)**: Short descriptions wrap correctly and no longer affect row height; long text is clipped to two lines so the list stays tidy and consistent.   ---
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..