Jump to content

(L2J) MMOPLAY Dynamic Rates| Server Revamping! Back online Soon.


Recommended Posts

Posted

It is important if this happens only against players cause this will create several problems. In fact the most important one is that there is usually less than 1% chance that a mob will actually win a battle against a player. Taking that into consideration there is a very high chance that all your work will end up having no point so this is something you should address.

 

Also if a mob kill another mob how exactly does it get stronger? is there a point to that? will it be more rewarding or just flat out harder for no reason? if all mobs are different will there be room for strategy or will it end up in players relying on pure strength to defeat mobs etc etc.

 

Im not trying to spoil it for you, im trying to adress isues that might pose a problem to the design.

Yes. Mobs can kill each other. Mobs can form alliances. Mobs will start forming own "clans". Mobs will evolve, finally mobs can invade. All depends on players, how they will control the situation. You will be able for example to steer mobs on other clans, use them as a tool on sieges, or make them fight each other. Ofc not all those features will be on right a way. That's why we put ".whatsnew" and ".soon" commands in game, accessible via player panel too, to show you what recently has been turned on and whats going to be tested next and when we plan to turn it on. You must understand, that this is a lot of work, over 2 years of development, that has been tested only in simulated situations, with no more than 30 people online...

 

Anyway, to make L2 people understand a little bit what we were working on, where we wanna go... It's not an official promo vid, it's not public (when promo vid is ready, you will be astonished ;P), however this might put some light on what I am talking about (watch full screen, HD):

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I'm on that same situation, but hey after almost 3600 commits it's almost playable! 😛
    • Probably due to poor choice of container handling items, you should test other types.   If it's not due to container, it can be whatever method impacting inventory, such as sort/filter/integrity checks. Bad synchronization can also grealty impact performance.   Another thing to check is about packet sending, you should use L2PHX to explore what is actually sent.
    • how do I make it so that you only deal damage to a mob if you have the right items equipped, like jewels, belt, underwear, bracelet, so if you don't have one of those items equipped, you don't deal any damage to the mob thanks
    • I always welcome bug reports and never ban ppl - until proven leaker - not sure where the "arrogant" part comes from, I would like to know what exactly let you think that (quote me please, and not 12y old quotes as the other frog meme dude). I request bug reports to be properly detailed, otherwise it's a waste of time. Other than that, I don't see where I have been arrogant. I got proper discussions with many ppl, not sure why you wouldn't be one of them.   I got 76 bug reports in my list (21 on forums, 55 on gitlab).   I have a single bug report regarding lvl 4 clan quest, which has to be tested since it's not even clear about what is supposed to be broken. Seven Signs was never reworked and is basically L2J based (we got a rework branch to test/commit with reworked AIs). Geoengine got no specific issues (at my knowledge), pathfinding was reworked lately to be way more performant, and I still try to improve performance using some pool system. Movement was partially fixed in latest 410, and probably will get another rework soon (notably reverting to the task wallclock).   "I" surely didn't spend 12y over geoengine - Hasha cared about geoengine during rev 334 / 354 / 390 / 395 and 397. It is solely his work, and always tagged as it. He was rewarded with money for his work, and almost a decade of aCis access.   aCis is a community work, things tagged with Tryskell is my work, the leftover is someone else work. 22 ppl worked as developers in this project over 14 years.   I would gladly accept whatever list of fixes/reports you have to share. You will even be rewarded (you probably know about cookie system), as anyone else sharing bug report or fixes.   My main concerns lately is the lack of decent L2OFF IL data, it is my main bottleneck actually. If you're aware about decent L2OFF data to parse, let me know.   Eventually reach me over Discord to speak, I don't want to continue the offtopic over that help request.
    • Your project doesn't compare to aCis; you have to be an idiot to use that. I know someone who bought the High Five "PREMIUM" version, which has the same bugs as the free version. If you want, I can share his latest premium version. Players are going through walls with their bad geoengine, falling under the Olympiad. If you want, I can record and prove what I'm saying. The aCis project is 50 steps ahead of yours and it's not even stable...
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock