Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello folks,

I decide to share this GM Shop that I'v made some days ago for L2Esen Project.

Here is it:

Link:
Here. LAST UPDATE: 09.03.2014

VirusScan:
https://www.virustotal.com/file/82536ecb45dc8f7dc00ca6f0ce2a12a87fb486d01ed06efee22448bceac68a23/analysis/1347402306/

Photo:
1main.png

Credits: Teddy

Edited by Teddy
Posted

LoL.. 200 post for one gm shop :X

If you can lower the hide post.. becuase its strange...

 

His shop, his rules. Respect or leave, simple like that :P

 

That's nice GM Shop, and yes, picture cannot be seen. I had to quote you in order to see the img link :( Not big deal, but still. :)

Posted

His shop, his rules. Respect or leave, simple like that

Just wanted to ask if he is can lower the hide/post.

So i was speak on autor and not on you.

Ok? Mr.Smart Ass


I fully respect and does not require anything.

Next time, if you do not understand something of my reply pm me to explain you and dont say bullshit.

Posted

So i was speak on autor and not on you.

Ok? Mr.Smart Ass

 

Don't try to make me look like "Mr.Smart Ass" and don't fight with me, bcs you will fail.

 

Anyway, "His shop, his rules.". He wanted 200, he did 200, so asking for reducin' post limit is useless. If you still don't get me, well.. that's your problem. End of story :)

 

Anyway, shop looks like that:

 

1main.png

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..