Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, I need a new name something good not hard to say it ..

To use it as username in many sites and use it on l2, counter strike or something ...

If you have any good name in your mind plx share it with me  i would be greatfull!

 

Edit: I want a single name not meaning something ,something random ..

Like , LeNaith ( i m using it atm but its for females chars only T_T)

 

 

Hope to get what i mean, thx anyway.

Posted

VictimHunter ;p

( kinigos thymatwn haha :D )

Lulz kalo einai .

But i forget to say that i want a single name not meaning something something random ..

Like , LeNaith ( i m using it atm but its for females chars only T_T)

Posted

I use this too.

 

It rocks.It has many names for many cases.

 

I posted to help DeathSoldier but anyway if it's good then ok!

 

:) :) :)

 

-Blane

Posted

lulz fovero!

BLANE GOD BLESS YOU

oh its so cool it have more than 1000 names ...

I choose some say what do you think about..

 

Zalen

Rydon

:o :o fovera!

 

Posted

What about SaiKoRn?

 

Note:I've never used that or saw it (it's just from my brain)  :P

Posted

lulz fovero!

BLANE GOD BLESS YOU

oh its so cool it have more than 1000 names ...

I choose some say what do you think about..

 

Zalen

Rydon

:o :o fovera!

 

 

Very good names ;)

 

GJ

Posted

np.

 

kapetan korakas(piasmeno)

papaflessas

kapetan mixalis

theodoros karaiskakis

 

I think he's looking something serious and...english?

Yes thanks.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..