Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

omg ppl did you even clicked on that link?

it is a device that you stick in the USB and it moves you're mouse just like an walker would do...at least that's what i understood. and this is to bypass anti-walker protection because the walker uses you're real mouse.

Posted

Hardware can easily be detected.... think of this like a HARDWARE mod for an Xbox versus a software mod.

 

USB bot = Hardware

Software bot = soft mod.

 

Stick with walker and other bot programs, dont waste your money on this.

Posted

 

Stick with walker and other bot programs, dont waste your money on this.

 

QFT!

 

besides that its for Kamael aka for CT1, CT1.5 is coming soon, so i guess it will probably be a waste of money.

 

it costs 160$ which is equal to ~ 23 walker codes or 21 superman cards.

 

in advance i believe that with this tool, you cant automate more than one client per pc, but i might be wrong on this one.

 

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Hardware can easily be detected.... think of this like a HARDWARE mod for an Xbox versus a software mod.

 

USB bot = Hardware

Software bot = soft mod.

now I know this thread was bumped from a month or so, but you had this wrong

 

hardware is impossible to detect. It can be detected on consoles because they have a specific setup in the first place, and because they're the ones designing the system.

 

Computer hardware detection is nooooooooowhere the same as it is on consoles. You can't compare the two.

Posted

Stick with walker and other bot programs, dont waste your money on this.

Agree with u dont WASTE ur money for such shits, but also DONT WASTE ur money for l2net or walker :P ☺ ☺ ☺

  • 6 months later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..