Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I want some ideas or some reviews about what server would be great to have.

Mid rate?

High rate?

Low rate?

Faction ? Multi skill?

 

Or ideas for a server. What would you prefer to play? How is your best server in your opinion?

 

I just wait some answers and some ideas also ^^

 

Also..what chronicle do you think is the best from now to create a server??

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Make a H5 server without attributes. That would please me. lol

 

Same here , No attris + no certi would be perfect and balanced plus admin could balance it easier.

 

About rates , Mid-rate , nor hard nor easy but you would "feel" then you are achieving something..

Posted

I have an idea don't know if it's done before it's more like the dominating ally is the winner,

 

The alliance can hold up to 9 clans and the first alliance in the server who control all the castles is the winner and the server get wiped, and start all over again.

 

This might sound like an easy thing to do but it isn't really since the fight start when the server start when it have at-least 2 alliances with 9 clan each and the ally have to defend all the 9 castles at the same time  in order to win the game ofc,

 

Hope you like the idea and do it cuz I would like to play in such a server someday :D

Posted

No..but the thing with attri and certi is bad.. I agree with them to make something to not enable them

Would be almost perfect.

Also some nice gameplay ideas..

Like raids or custom items..or something to be more atractive.

 

 

The idea with 1 big ally is not so good. Better to get in ally only 2 clans and not 3.. So there will be full of pvp because lot's of clan wars :> eh?

Posted

I think that you have missed what I mean...

It's more like the (good/evil) servers I think it's named "Faction Server" if I'm not mistaken, but in this one you get to have more teams as in alliances but you need at-least two of them to start the round which is to control all of the 9 castles.

That's what I mean so in the end there will winning alliance in the server and it get wiped after any alliance wins, and the round starts all over again.

 

 

It would give you good advantage as "Admin" to fix the bugs and make more balanced classes in the server depending on polls you make in the server forum about the attribute or class certification skills and adding new armors weapons skills or removing any of them

you will keep the players always working and never get bored because they have every thing can be made in the server or because they became what some people would call "IMBA"

 

 

And for me personal I like it for the team work because the lonely fighter style wont be working since you need to be with the strongest 9 clans in the server in order to be a winner

 

 

But at the end it's up to you to decide whether to make such a server or not if I had the enough time I would make such a server myself

 

Best luck finding the best ideas for your server

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I always welcome bug reports and never ban ppl - until proven leaker - not sure where the "arrogant" part comes from, I would like to know what exactly let you think that (quote me please, and not 12y old quotes as the other frog meme dude). I request bug reports to be properly detailed, otherwise it's a waste of time. Other than that, I don't see where I have been arrogant. I got proper discussions with many ppl, not sure why you wouldn't be one of them.   I got 76 bug reports in my list (21 on forums, 55 on gitlab).   I have a single bug report regarding lvl 4 clan quest, which has to be tested since it's not even clear about what is supposed to be broken. Seven Signs was never reworked and is basically L2J based (we got a rework branch to test/commit with reworked AIs). Geoengine got no specific issues (at my knowledge), pathfinding was reworked lately to be way more performant, and I still try to improve performance using some pool system. Movement was partially fixed in latest 410, and probably will get another rework soon (notably reverting to the task wallclock).   "I" surely didn't spend 12y over geoengine - Hasha cared about geoengine during rev 334 / 354 / 390 / 395 and 397. It is solely his work, and always tagged as it. He was rewarded with money for his work, and almost a decade of aCis access.   aCis is a community work, things tagged with Tryskell is my work, the leftover is someone else work. 22 ppl worked as developers in this project over 14 years.   I would gladly accept whatever list of fixes/reports you have to share. You will even be rewarded (you probably know about cookie system), as anyone else sharing bug report or fixes.   My main concerns lately is the lack of decent L2OFF IL data, it is my main bottleneck actually. If you're aware about decent L2OFF data to parse, let me know.
    • Your project doesn't compare to aCis; you have to be an idiot to use that. I know someone who bought the High Five "PREMIUM" version, which has the same bugs as the free version. If you want, I can share his latest premium version. Players are going through walls with their bad geoengine, falling under the Olympiad. If you want, I can record and prove what I'm saying. The aCis project is 50 steps ahead of yours and it's not even stable...
    • l2jteon, l2joneo l2jscoria etc etc. and from that we went to this 
    • Thanks a lot. Sadly I can't give more reactions today, but thanks again!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock