Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

work only for c4 server?

thx for share dude :)

 

I guess if you have enough Codding skills, you can do it, or even put it in more than 1 extender, but i doubt you have them, so downloading it will be something like, filling space in your hard drive for nothing.

 

Btw sandeagle, you got +1 karma for this share, for me its very helpful.

Posted

I guess if you have enough Codding skills, you can do it, or even put it in more than 1 extender, but i doubt you have them, so downloading it will be something like, filling space in your hard drive for nothing.

 

Btw sandeagle, you got +1 karma for this share, for me its very helpful.

 

Such coding skills as opening the source and seeing clear plain text comments about hooks for dvamp exe and "native openpp" exe side by side?

 

 

Posted

I guess if you have enough Codding skills, you can do it, or even put it in more than 1 extender, but i doubt you have them, so downloading it will be something like, filling space in your hard drive for nothing.

 

Btw sandeagle, you got +1 karma for this share, for me its very helpful.

 

+1 karma because it is something else you can sell and palm off as your own work?

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...
Posted

i expected it to leak out when i put my l2 shit on sale. anyhow its old c4. who cares :] nabs wont be able to use it anyway. oh it also crashes sometimes :D

  • 1 year later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

include windows.inc

 

 

 

.DATA

 

EXTRN ?CanSellItem@COfflineShop@@SA_NPEAVCItem@@@Z:PROC

.CODE

 

ManagePrivateStoreFilterHook proc

    mov rax, [rcx+30h]

    cmp dword ptr[rax+70h], 39h

    jnz @F

    ret

  @@:

    push rax

    push rcx

    sub rsp, 20h

    call ?CanSellItem@COfflineShop@@SA_NPEAVCItem@@@Z

    add rsp, 20h

    cmp rax, 0

    pop rcx

    pop rax

    ret

ManagePrivateStoreFilterHook endp

 

END

 

for compile im ML64

  • 1 year later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
    • GoldRush launches tomorrow! July 18 16:00 GMT+3 Europe / International Register your account in the website, connect wallet and be ready to dominate!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..