Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

These are some of the decrypted strings Fyyre was able to decrypt.

 

http://fyyre.ivory-tower.de/gameguard/rev_1467.txt

 

pos 9D1FC: L2Walker Mutex

pos 9D210: MutexToL2Walker

 

Think you are safe using walker on retail? :<

Posted

well, im no GG expert. But if a string with walker lines are in the GG, it cant be a good thing.

Posted

These are some of the decrypted strings Fyyre was able to decrypt.

 

http://fyyre.ivory-tower.de/gameguard/rev_1467.txt

 

pos 9D1FC: L2Walker Mutex

pos 9D210: MutexToL2Walker

 

Think you are safe using walker on retail? :<

 

I think you're addressing this to the wrong crowd :). And it could be just a check package, besides, lots of people disable GG on retail :).

 

It does get me a little worried cause I was keeping l2w opened on a private server while playing on retail with GG enabled. And by looking at the strings it seems it sends NCSOFT info about running processes.

Posted

Hooray! Now we know that GameGuard is aware that there's a program named L2Walker out there in the world!

 

Doesn't mean that GG's detection is any good or that NCSoft even cares.

 

Let me know when L2.Net's auto-settings are on par with Walker. :3

Posted

Did I ever mention L2.NET?

 

Sigh... What this means is that GG is able to detect and ban members via GG string detections from processes.

 

Think before you post next time, thanks for your input.

 

Just fyi, the auto settings already surpass walker in many areas... and the scripting already surpasses L2walker is every way.

 

 

 

 

I think you're addressing this to the wrong crowd :). And it could be just a check package, besides, lots of people disable GG on retail :).

 

It does get me a little worried cause I was keeping l2w opened on a private server while playing on retail with GG enabled. And by looking at the strings it seems it sends NCSOFT info about running processes.

 

Yep, intrussive GG is intrussive. God I hate these kinds of protections, there are way better protections then invading privacy.

Posted

Did I ever mention L2.NET?

We all know that's why you posted this.

 

Sigh... What this means is that GG is able to detect and ban members via GG string detections from processes.

No it doesn't. It means that's what it *might* be doing, but that output doesn't automagically mean that (although it's a fairly safe guess that's why that string is there). And I'm going to guess that GG has been using string detection for years since it's a common form of detection and yet Walker still runs rampant. Clearly, NCSoft doesn't care.

 

Think before you post next time, thanks for your input.

Righty-o.

 

Just fyi, the auto settings already surpass walker in many areas...

I'll remember that next time L2.Net hangs up on a rock for 16 hours.

 

and the scripting already surpasses L2walker is every way.

Did I ever mention scripting?

Posted

I'll remember that next time L2.Net hangs up on a rock for 16 hours.

Did I ever mention scripting?

if you are too noob to set a bot which requires more to put 1-2 checkboxes maybe you just shouldnt ;o

Posted

if you are too noob to set a bot which requires more to put 1-2 checkboxes maybe you just shouldnt ;o

Aw, that's cute. Take your face and cradle it in your palm.

I didn't say the program was confusing or difficult to use.

 

I have nothing against L2.Net. I use it when I need to. It's scripting is unparalleled (especially by Walker's joke of a scripting language--do you even know how to script killik?) in the botting world. Unfortunately, that doesn't make its autofighter settings better then they are.

Posted

Aw, that's cute. Take your face and cradle it in your palm.

I didn't say the program was confusing or difficult to use.

 

I have nothing against L2.Net. I use it when I need to. It's scripting is unparalleled (especially by Walker's joke of a scripting language--do you even know how to script killik?) in the botting world. Unfortunately, that doesn't make its autofighter settings better then they are.

Thats why you  script your own autofighter  doh

 

Posted

Seems to defeat the purpose, eh?

you know how bout you just stop smart assing

First you try imply that  mpj123 s post is for L2net

First of all mpj is famous for trying to break bot protections

You can look at his latest achievement of writing a script to workaround the rpg club protection which is  nothing simple

 

So whats so unbelieveable  about him checking decrypted gameguard files and posting something about it with out a hidden agenda since it is  some hobby of his.

 

 

To get back to the  walker vs l2net  argument

If you wanna compare l2net to walker walker looses by far

as you said the scripting is a main feature of l2net which is very great and if you cant script as  casual user you can use script s of other ppl which makes the bot much much better since the scripting community is much bigger for l2net compared to walker

 

Just because you didnt check stuff about l2net for a long time it doesnt mean it didnt improve

Best example Lazy script by l2agita where you can make alot of settings even with a ingame menu and set stuff like corpse life drain/body 2 mind without issues/blacklist mobs automatically your train cant reach  etc etc  and many many more things

 

If you come again and cry about autofighter

Prolly you didnt even notice but the autofighter improved in the last version of l2net with poison bleed cure which it hadnt before "auto unstuck"feature just to name few importent updates to it

how about updates for walker besides supporting a new chronicle? Besides that it costs money

 

 

So i dont care how smart you think you are for me you are a -_- smartass nothing more nothing less

Acting all mighty for what?

Who doesnt know the famous foxfire who did what in the pserver community? Compared to mpj you are a joke

 

 

 

Posted

So whats so unbelieveable  about him checking decrypted gameguard files and posting something about it with out a hidden agenda since it is  some hobby of his.

What's so unbelievable about someone having an agenda?

 

If you wanna compare l2net to walker walker looses by far

Thank you Captain Obvious. I don't realize that point was even under debate.

 

Prolly you didnt even notice but the autofighter improved in the last version of l2net with poison bleed cure which it hadnt before "auto unstuck"feature just to name few importent updates to it

Actually, I did notice. And I'm very glad that they're taking some time to work on that autofighter even though it goes against their fundamental philosophy of, 'script everything.' But, out of the box, Walker is still more robust. As you so keenly pointed out, scripts can improve the function of the autofighter, but I was comparing the OOB autofighter functionality.

 

So i dont care how smart you think you are for me you are a -_- smartass nothing more nothing less

Acting all mighty for what?

Who doesnt know the famous foxfire who did what in the pserver community? Compared to mpj you are a joke

Who's mpj?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • To Finish this, because it's need a explanation   1. “I come to your forum” — It's the L2JMobius forum, not mine. I'm a contributor, not the owner or the maintainer responsible for deciding which fixes get committed.   2. “Which is why I left” — That's not an accurate account of what happened. You may have left voluntarily once, but you were also banned from the Discord server three times after repeatedly returning and causing the same disruptions. Those are not the same thing.   3. “You personally reply and reject that it works” — I asked how a negative withdrawal could be performed and later requested a demonstration of the claimed exploit. At no point did I reject the patch or claim the vulnerability was impossible. Asking for evidence is not the same as rejecting someone's work.   4. “You leave it unpatched for days” — I don't make that decision. Whether and when a patch gets committed is entirely up to the project maintainer, not me.   5. “You challenge me to post a video” — Yes, I asked you to demonstrate the exploit. You interpreted that as a rejection of your work, which it wasn't. Requesting proof of a claimed exploit is a perfectly reasonable part of technical discussion.   6. “Asshole-ness is a mutually contracted disease” — You're responsible for your own behavior, just as I'm responsible for mine. Disagreeing with you or questioning your claims doesn't justify personal insults. If you believe I've treated you unfairly, address what I actually said rather than making my behavior an excuse for yours.   And one question remains unanswered: why did you publicly disclose the exploitationmethod before the fix was released, after previously saying you wanted to avoid harming the project?   The vulnerability was real, the fix was accepted, and the commit was published. I have no problem acknowledging any of that.   My disagreement has never been about whether the bug deserved to be fixed. It's about how you've handled the discussion and repeatedly misrepresented my role in it.     I have nothing against you personally. My issue is with the way you conduct yourself in these discussions.   And no, you're not obligated to prove anything to me. However, when you make a technical claim, the burden of proof is on you. You cannot reasonably expect others to accept your claims without sufficient evidence.   Questioning a claim is not the same as rejecting it, nor is it a personal attack.
    • Mobius users develop a cult-like fanaticism towards the Hellenic overlord like how they do with pedric this should be something that is studied since it is truly so weird
    • I edited my reply cause it was too rude. But you had already answered.
    • As if I’m the one hiding behind alt accounts just to get attention.   Anyway, congratulations on the commit—that’s what you wanted, right?   P.S. Why did you edit your last reply? It’s pointless; it’s already quoted right there, in case you hadn’t noticed.   EOF
    • Let me think ...   I come to your forum, I send you a fix for the exploit. I do not mention that its exploit nor I say how to reproduce it cause Mobius got mad the last time this happened. You personally reply and reject that it works. Probably you didnt understood it.  But then again you personally have been an asshole to me for months in your shitty discord server (which is why i left). I reply back and hint you how it works without giving unnecessary details, you still dont understand. You leave it unpatched for days ... Then you come here mention me and challenge me to post a video of the exploit ...   Asshole-ness is a mutually contracted disease. If you stop being one, I can stop being one.     
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..