Jump to content

Mega Discussion!L2walker versus L2NET!


xTheVioLaToR

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

you know what....while i believe you are a really talented botter/programmer i believe you are not a proffesional...

pro's would act like this:

Customer:this is complicated

Creator of l2net:you think so?i will try to make it less complicated with more photos and videos so that

you can understand it better....

 

 

Don't take it as an attack just as a friendly advice....

mpj didn't make L2.Net... and fyi v384 makes some huge strides towards addressing usability issues that people have with L2.Net.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

L2W is better for me cose eazier way to make scripts and if u are a good scripeter u can make almost anithink

l2.net scripts may seem complicated,a few of them really are very complicated,but with a decent brain and a grain of logic it's not really that difficult to make net scripts better than walker ones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you know what....while i believe you are a really talented botter/programmer i believe you are not a proffesional...

pro's would act like this:

Customer:this is complicated

Creator of l2net:you think so?i will try to make it less complicated with more photos and videos so that

you can understand it better....

 

 

Don't take it as an attack just as a friendly advice....

 

There is alot going on behind the scenes that you do not know about, like Slothmo said, I am not the developer of L2.NET, more of a senior user and community manager... I try and address the complaints in person, many times I will talk to the devs and address such issues with fellow other advanced members to come up with solutions.

 

I personally do not see users as customers as L2.NET is mostly free, in the long run, I have spent over 500$ towards L2.NET and its devs to help support the bot. I make videos whenever something is unclear, the latest is the L2.NET login guide, I made over 6 other videos explaining features and basic login features as well, and well over 20 written well documented guides.

 

I can only help people so much, people have to help themselves beforehand. I remember when I started to bot with L2Walker, everything was so unfamiliar... but as you use it more and more, you become savy and can fend for yourself. Same with L2.NET, you just have to give it a chance and get away from old habits and expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

2.net scripts may seem complicated,a few of them really are very complicated,but with a decent brain and a grain of logic it's not really that difficult to make net scripts better than walker ones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

L2W is better for me cose eazier way to make scripts and if u are a good scripeter u can make almost anithink

 

with L2Walker you CAN'T do almost anything, is very basic with scripts

 

my experience with both programs tells me that L2Net is better, at first because is easier to connect to any server and i never have really any problem configuring the bot (and i dont know anything about making scripts, just basic things) and Walker is easy to configure in general, but that general part is very limited :/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Client packet

 

0F DB 4E 00 00 C7 1F 02 00 76 F2 FF FF 31 4E 00 00 C7 1F 02 00 76 F2 FF FF 01 00 00 00

Type: 0x0F (MoveBackwardToLocation)

Size: 29+2

Time: 18:06:40:350

0002 d ToX: 20187 (0x00004EDB)

0006 d ToY: 139207 (0x00021FC7)

000A d ToZ: -3466 (0xFFFFF276)

000E d OrigX: 20017 (0x00004E31)

0012 d OrigY: 139207 (0x00021FC7)

0016 d OrigZ: -3466 (0xFFFFF276)

001A d MoveMovement: 1 (0x00000001)

 

L2walker packet

0F DB 4E 00 00 C7 1F 02 00 76 F2 FF FF 31 4E 00 00 C7 1F 02 00 76 F2 FF FF

Type: 0x0F (MoveBackwardToLocation)

Size: 25+2

Time: 18:16:44:699

0002 d ToX: 20187 (0x00004EDB)

0006 d ToY: 139207 (0x00021FC7)

000A d ToZ: -3466 (0xFFFFF276)

000E d OrigX: 20017 (0x00004E31)

0012 d OrigY: 139207 (0x00021FC7)

0016 d OrigZ: -3466 (0xFFFFF276)

 

banned. GJ l2walker.

 

 

Net FTW. dont need to worry about a script to make the bot send correct packet to the server just to move around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from my point of view l2w is easy to setup and run the bot but scipting is quiet limited in commands and also l2w have very often problem with moving and attacking mobs. like in fog were is many walls and very often stuck which causes bots die. another thing i discovered that the options of pathpoint is a bit dissapoining because the bot is not moving with the red line between the circules.

 

about l2n i cant say much because i haven't used it for a long time but the setuping it is more difficult and making scripts is just an horror:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Hello if anyone is looking for interlude server with free bot, no P2W and uniques features I can recommend freshly opened https://l2romans.com/features/, great server for chilling and having fun with friends casually. Everyone is welcomed
    • So excited to announce 3x Telegram Premium (6 months)   Join our official TG and participate to win!   Asocks.com - trusted proxy service providing mobile and residential proxies with a single price of $3 per 1GB   A huge locations pool and high speed will help complete all tasks    
    • Well, sorry not sorry for resurrecting old topic, but I believe it's ultimately stupid to implement license checks like Vilmis did 🙂   private static String url = "jdbc:mysql://185.80.128.233/" + getData("Zm9ydW1fZGI="); private static String username = getData("bXJjb3B5cmlnaHQ="); private static String password = getData("Y29weXJpZ2h0XzEyMw=="); con = GlobalDB.getInstance().getConnection(); PreparedStatement statement; statement = con.prepareStatement("SELECT field_6 from core_pfields_content WHERE member_id = ?"); statement.setInt(1, Config.FORUM_USER_ID); ResultSet rset = statement.executeQuery();   This awesome way of coding things leaves us with base64-encoded credentials and DB exposed and accessible globally 😉 Btw he checks his licensing data from some plugin generated table his forum uses. Vilmis took action and ensured that mrcopyright user would have only needed accesses and rights for this operation. But he forgot to ensure that his INFORMATION_SCHEMA database would not be exposed and readable... That leads us to fully readable server variables like version used (10.1.26-MariaDB-0+deb9u1 - pretty ancient DB and OS, I'd assume). From here you can go south and do some kinky stuff, if you want and have knowledge for that. But who cares, right?   Ooh, table core_pfields_content field_6 is IP address which is checked by FORUM_USER_ID. Yep, you can query all IP addresses there (124 of them right now) and also do whatever you want with them! 🙂  The most fun part? Files source has been shared what, more than 2 years ago?  Vilmis still uses very same credentials and never changed it after sources exposure - who cares. Although, "sources" may be way too strong word here. If anyone still use paid Orion versions, I'd suggest packing your shit and leaving immediately, or at least fix this incompetent fool caused problems. It's obvious Vilmis don't care or maybe doesn't even know from the first place how to solve this problem (hint hint - tiny PHP Rest API microservice which would do absolutely the same but without exposing sensitive data?). By doing that, he exposes his infrastructure and YOUR data, and he does that for more than 2 years now 🙂 Developer of century!    
    • rename the l2.bin into l2.exe
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...