[Share]Interlude - ActionFailed packet rework

[Intrepid]

Well thats another annoying thing for me atleast in interlude so heres an ActionFailed rework.

 

basically you send an actionfailed packet like this: sendPacket(new ActionFailed());

after rework you send it like this: sendPacket(ActionFailed.STATIC_PACKET);

 

http://pastebin.com/f3a0e467a

 

credits to me

[Devangell™]

can i ask something?if you take this code's you can create one .exe program and attack somewhat one server???Only question is..

[Intrepid]

can i ask something?if you take this code's you can create one .exe program and attack somewhat one server???Only question is..

 

what the holy shit are you talking about :D

[Devangell™]

what the holy shit are you talking about :D

you talk for packet's and came to my mind the phx can we create one program with that packet?

[Intrepid]

you talk for packet's and came to my mind the phx can we create one program with that packet?

 

a program that flood actionfailed?that sounds pretty dumb since actionfailed abort something you send 1packet and you abort the action so... :D

[Devangell™]

a program that flood actionfailed?that sounds pretty dumb since actionfailed abort something you send 1packet and you abort the action so... :D

btw thanks....

[Versus]

I prefer it as it is on interlude now. I dunno why, i might be used to it.

Anyway it has no difference.. so..

[Intrepid]

I prefer it as it is on interlude now. I dunno why, i might be used to it.

Anyway it has no difference.. so..

 

depends on tastes for me the gracia style is fit better maybe for others too anyway yeah no difference

[Guest Рrototype]

what exacly help that change ?

can you answer me pls

[Intrepid]

what exacly help that change ?

can you answer me pls

 

its just tastes its a "visual thing" in the code how you want to call the actionfailed

[Guest Рrototype]

aa and this rework dont fix any exploits ?

 

PS: thanks i was wondering why in some packs the actionfailed is called by other way ;D

[Intrepid]

aa and this rework dont fix any exploits ?

 

PS: thanks i was wondering why in some packs the actionfailed is called by other way ;D

 

nahh im not intented to fix anything in a dead chronicle

[B1ggBoss]

since you are accessing the packet in a static way, you could change the constructor visibility to private

[Grim.]

lol

Intrepid worked on interlude ?

holly

[Intrepid]

since you are accessing the packet in a static way, you could change the constructor visibility to private

 

lol just a question since you talk like that B1ggBoss from l2jforum? :P