Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The reason for what you smitted for 3rd time Exte was unfair and considered as abuse.

He neither flamed you or vazelos, nor spammed.

 

And btw any clear reason for what he should get banned?

Posted

General Flaming, you can ask others members before i clear my topic that he had Double Posted and flammed Vazelos.

 

 

If i am wrong you can restore and clear his karma log of course.

 

Sorry again, i am doing many mistakes then as i understand.

Posted

General Flaming, you can ask others members before i clear my topic that he had Double Posted and flammed Vazelos.

 

 

If i am wrong you can restore and clear his karma log of course.

 

Sorry again, i am doing many mistakes then as i understand.

 

Date Registered:  October 05, 2009, 07:57:27 AM

 

Lol dude everyone has made many mistakes...

Just the post where you've smitted him, doesn't show any flaming or double posting.

Next time better wait for a Mod to see it, and then delete replies =]

BTW I won't give any karmas, not only for Exte, but generally, as I think that karma is just a number of pixels in a screen, as I have previously said.

 

And lastly: Wait till he gets -4/-5 karma. With -3 he does not get banned.

Posted

Stop QQing to moderators about how mean I am.

 

I may be mean, but normal people like (ED/OmGG/Billistain/Kenji/Nikoloudos and much more) do not consider my posts as flames but full of fun posts.

 

So, after a 2seconds thinking, it's YOU having the problem, not me.

Posted

ban exte? QQz?

 

^^'

 

@Exte

 

[GR]Οτι σπαμαρεις και εισαι συνεχως off-topic , ειναι αληθεια. Το οτι αυτα που λες εχουν φαση και δημιουργουν χαβαλε, ειναι αλλο θεμα.

Να μαστε και ειλικρινεις κιολας.

 

Anyway, let the mods decide.

Posted

:(

Count down till I'm banned cuz of Sillllllllllllllllllllllllllent (You should add more L's, stupid moron did your translator failed?)

 

@Skiller: E, to protimo auto apo to na kano san Wannabe Mod (vl. Sillent)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..