Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

No Working for me... I think there need more code ?

Try this(note: i just coded it, i didn't add boolean to allow this, and i didn't test it):

Index: java/net/sf/l2j/gameserver/model/actor/instance/L2PcInstance.java
===================================================================
--- java/net/sf/l2j/gameserver/model/actor/instance/L2PcInstance.java	(revision 110)
+++ java/net/sf/l2j/gameserver/model/actor/instance/L2PcInstance.java	(working copy)
@@ -4555,6 +4555,7 @@
		)
		{
             increasePvpKills();
+            setFightStatsTitle();
		}
		else                                                                        // Target player doesn't have pvp flag set
		{
@@ -4567,6 +4568,7 @@
                     {
                         // 'Both way war' -> 'PvP Kill'
                         increasePvpKills();
+                        setFightStatsTitle();
                         return;
                     }
                 }
@@ -4578,11 +4580,13 @@
				if ( Config.KARMA_AWARD_PK_KILL )
				{
                     increasePvpKills();
+                    setFightStatsTitle();
				}
			}
			else if (targetPlayer.getPvpFlag() == 0)                                                                    // Target player doesn't have karma
			{
                 increasePkKillsAndKarma(targetPlayer.getLevel());
+                setFightStatsTitle();
			}
		}
	}
@@ -4591,6 +4595,10 @@
      * Increase the pvp kills count and send the info to the player
      *
      */
+    public void setFightStatsTitle()
+    {
+        setTitle(+getPvpKills()+" "+getPkKills());
+    }
     public void increasePvpKills()
     {
         // Add karma to attacker and increase its PK counter

I didn't code it on clear l2j files, so careful, applying the patch may not work. You may have to add it manually. Title will appear like:

X Y (where x pvp points and y pk points)

  • 1 month later...
  • 6 months later...
Posted

Plz, create your patch in clear l2j.

In L2PcInstance.java, I dont find

// Update the character's name color if they reached any of the 5 PvP

or

public void PvpReward() {

if (L2Config.PVP_REWARD_ENABLED) {

Fix it now!

Posted

Nice idea ;p thx for this code its usefull on pvp servers ;p

 

U should add voice command like .Titleon .titleoff or smth  b/c i think not all players whana pvp count title ;p

Posted

 

Quote from: xDunno on October 04, 2009, 09:23:02 PM

Nice idea ;p thx for this code its usefull on pvp servers ;p

 

U should add voice command like .Titleon .titleoff or smth  b/c i think not all players whana pvp count title ;p

 

Agree. Very good idea.

Posted

Nice idea ;p thx for this code its usefull on pvp servers ;p

 

U should add voice command like .Titleon .titleoff or smth  b/c i think not all players whana pvp count title ;p

Good idea - Plz, fix in clear source and add this command!

Thanks.

 

Posted

Plz, create your patch in clear l2j.

In L2PcInstance.java, I dont find

// Update the character's name color if they reached any of the 5 PvP

or

public void PvpReward() {

if (L2Config.PVP_REWARD_ENABLED) {

Fix it now!

Posted

Good job dude... but i think that having the fight stats title in a diff color than

the normal one would be better... since sb would write a fake ttl with pvps,pks etc..

anyways thx for sharing

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..