Jump to content

Would you play on this server? Do you want it? or It is useless..??  

22 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you play on this server? Do you want it? or It is useless..??

    • Yes, I will play on this server and I will support this community!
      14
    • No, I dont really care...
      5
    • I dont know.
      3


Recommended Posts

Posted

i would play only if server would be steam with amx mod x vac2 protections and ufbteam anti cheat addon...

 

 

UFBTeam Addon

 

If a user is not using ufb launcher then he is at

 

say: cheater

list

 

if he take an amount of votes that he is a cheater he will be kicked and he will need to open ufb laucher first!

 

He will be banned by steam id also..

Posted

If I open this server , I will choose experienced people for admins , who will be active and fair!

 

 

 

Actually you won't choose experienced people but friends.

 

 

 

ahahah, i dont think so

 

http://www.maxcheaters.com/forum/index.php?topic=84269.0

 

 

wtf? self pwned.

 

Posted

I just don't trust anyone who plays in non-steam servers. And yea i have seen your name somewhere where you were cheating.

 

Now seriously do you believe that making a non-steam server is a cool idea? Let's take an example... KAPSIMO... even the admins hack there.

Posted

If I had a community in CS 1.6 (NOOOO Nevahhhhh), Kapsimo or however that newbish community is called, wouldn't be even 1% comparing with my community's success..These morons ban ANYONE who pwnes them just because they are too lows..It's funny because I logged only one day and the admin wanted to ban me because he said I was walling..o.O..That's what a serious admin is YEEE...Pfff..

 

As for the server, dude...STAY UP TO DATE...2 Years will pass, and you will still be thinking of CS server...Why don't you make a CSS Section to see what real game means?I repeat it once again: STAY UP TO DATE, as everyone in the whole world does..

Posted

Ι personally learn cs on kapsimo servers & I was admin here , but some of the head admins suck..so -beep-...

 

 

Our server will be hosted (perhaps) from here HERE

 

 

***We will patch it because again this server will be steam..so.. we have work..

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..