-
Posts
-
new synchronized movement with neoengine obstacle correction I reported bugs to you and you completely ignored me because of my nationality. Yes, you were arrogant towards me. I sent you many questions on your forum and you didn't even thank me or say anything about it. I stopped using your updates a long time ago and focused on fixing my own aCis because you intentionally break the code. Just buy versions 401 to 409; you intentionally broke a lot of things for "IDIOTS" to buy from you. Anyway, our conversation ends here. Good luck with renaming and organizing; that probably makes you more money than fixing the basics. -
I'm on that same situation, but hey after almost 3600 commits it's almost playable! 😛 -
Probably due to poor choice of container handling items, you should test other types. If it's not due to container, it can be whatever method impacting inventory, such as sort/filter/integrity checks. Bad synchronization can also grealty impact performance. Another thing to check is about packet sending, you should use L2PHX to explore what is actually sent. -
By L2craftworld · Posted
how do I make it so that you only deal damage to a mob if you have the right items equipped, like jewels, belt, underwear, bracelet, so if you don't have one of those items equipped, you don't deal any damage to the mob thanks -
I always welcome bug reports and never ban ppl - until proven leaker - not sure where the "arrogant" part comes from, I would like to know what exactly let you think that (quote me please, and not 12y old quotes as the other frog meme dude). I request bug reports to be properly detailed, otherwise it's a waste of time. Other than that, I don't see where I have been arrogant. I got proper discussions with many ppl, not sure why you wouldn't be one of them. I got 76 bug reports in my list (21 on forums, 55 on gitlab). I have a single bug report regarding lvl 4 clan quest, which has to be tested since it's not even clear about what is supposed to be broken. Seven Signs was never reworked and is basically L2J based (we got a rework branch to test/commit with reworked AIs). Geoengine got no specific issues (at my knowledge), pathfinding was reworked lately to be way more performant, and I still try to improve performance using some pool system. Movement was partially fixed in latest 410, and probably will get another rework soon (notably reverting to the task wallclock). "I" surely didn't spend 12y over geoengine - Hasha cared about geoengine during rev 334 / 354 / 390 / 395 and 397. It is solely his work, and always tagged as it. He was rewarded with money for his work, and almost a decade of aCis access. aCis is a community work, things tagged with Tryskell is my work, the leftover is someone else work. 22 ppl worked as developers in this project over 14 years. I would gladly accept whatever list of fixes/reports you have to share. You will even be rewarded (you probably know about cookie system), as anyone else sharing bug report or fixes. My main concerns lately is the lack of decent L2OFF IL data, it is my main bottleneck actually. If you're aware about decent L2OFF data to parse, let me know. Eventually reach me over Discord to speak, I don't want to continue the offtopic over that help request.
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now