Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

he meant, what do you know from this forum to indicate one member to Staff?

Not a question about smart/dumb.

He must be a member to know this forum? , I was guest like 4-5 months before I registered and watch what happened here

every single day. So his knowledge about the forum is relevant.

Posted

He must be a member to know this forum? , I was guest like 4-5 months before I registered and watch what happened here

every single day. So his knowledge about the forum is relevant.

Thank God there are people who understand me.
Posted

Pff come on!Why do you still discuss about this???All of us wanted to be in the staff.Ok it's pretty normal to want to be in the staff.But it's totally abnormal and foolish to judge bad the guyz that have been promoted.My point is that they may did not deserve,maybe the did and still do,but why the hell don't you want to give them a second chance??Is that so difficult to do??Stop judging 'coz the most of you know that there will come a day that you will be where they are and then you will be more than pissed off.Do you know how it is to get a promotion and everyone tells you that you paid for it or that you don't deserve it?It's really lame.So i suggest to stop judging and give you congratulations to everyone that got promoted!

 

Posted

Pff come on!Why do you still discuss about this???

 

I am wondering the same here.

 

 

PPl just remember this one:

 

So , this -beep-ing conversations about team promotes - demotes will stop from now ON. it's up to the team & maxtor! If i catch any users to talk about promotes and demotes will be punished firstly with -1 karma without warning. Because this thread is a WARNING. And if someone continue and ignore the warnings will be banned using this forum.

 

locked.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..