Jump to content

Which is the best at aoe?  

276 members have voted

  1. 1. Which is the best at aoe?

    • Destro
      185
    • Warlord
      95


Recommended Posts

Posted

I vote both :P If you know the game for one better, choose him. For lvling up your other chars, Warlord is maybe better. Still I always play destro :)) He is just mighty :D... but I'm going to make a warlord on lowrate now and compare, because it's a long time since a played one.

Posted

Well it deppends , every class has hes bad side and good side , a warlord can be very useful for mass pvp with hes mass stun and a titan can be useful for raid bosses so every class is good at something and bad at something.

Posted

If you know how to play with WarLord, all destros are PWNED, so my vote goes to WL...

+1 and not only wl Tanks too. WL has almost 4 stuns which actually work!
Posted

i vot for warlord... but! think is that if u want PVP  then Destro FTW! if u need to farm fast... in custom servers for exemple then warlord help u ;) best char for me is Necro.... LifeSteel ROCKS!!!

Posted

Omg all guys say "Destro for sure...frenzy n' zealot"

So you are going to aoe just for 1 min and with 13 minutes downtime.. This will happen if you base your aoe to frenzy and zealot... BUT warlord can make train easily with provoke (+ resist to pole) then 3 landing stuns and howl... How can he die ? (+ battle roar + revival ) and after gracia final WL can pvp pretty good too so .. qq Destroyers

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..