Project I'm developing the new L2 Classic server in .NET

[911reg]

5 hours ago, xdem said:

 

You make no sense mate, am I arguing with a Junior ? 

 

You put a link to a dead unfinished project to prove what ? Its also shit-coded, and you are talking about geoengine specifically ? You must be retarded 
 

i think you got the wrong person 

[xdem]

1 hour ago, 911reg said:

i think you got the wrong person 

 

so true, I am retarded, I though it was the author who responded,

thanks haha

[Tryskell]

Good luck with your project - from the moment you take pleasure, it's the essential.

If you manage to improve performance over specific points compared to L2J (knownlist, geoengine, movement,...), don't hesitate to share back on your topic what/why you did it and the actual performance gain, if measured. Edited July 26, 2024 by Tryskell

[rufi]

On 7/12/2024 at 5:58 AM, Grymyr said:

My statement was "2) using modern tools like ORMs (EF core) with ability to use different DBMS (I already switched from MySQL to PostgreSQL)". No words about PostgreSQL specific features, just the ability to use various DBMS via EF core.
Moreover using PostgreSQL specific features would prevent having this ability. 
Now switching to another DBMS is as simple as replacing DBMS provider Nuget package. All plain SQL has been replaced to EF core queries in the code.

Without discouraging your enthusiasm, and having looked at what you went through... I think you asked Cursor to migrate l2j to .net.... on the other hand clearly you don't have experience in programming or in a high concurrency project... since in this kind of issues ORMs don't work... think that if it would work well in l2j we would use Spring Data with hibernate and that kind of things. it's not like that, unfortunately the best way to talk to the database in an efficient way is optimizing queries and interaction with the database.

Don't get discouraged just keep researching!

 

[zambog420]

Just one question — can exactly what you're doing be done with Python?