Request Attack Speed problem with ultra status server [aCis]

[Hash]

I'm developing an ultra status server using an L2jAcis revision, but after a certain amount of attack speed, it becomes possible to bug your attacks, and you start attacking at an exponential speed. I would like to know if anyone has already developed a mod that resolves this situation, something similar to what was developed for l2jfrozen.

 

 

Heres the frozen code example. I tryed to migrate this code to aCis, but didint work.

 

Quote

### Eclipse Workspace Patch 1.0
#P L2jFrozen_GameServer_831

Index: head-src/com/l2jfrozen/Config.java
===================================================================
--- head-src/com/l2jfrozen/Config.java (revisão 957)
+++ head-src/com/l2jfrozen/Config.java (cópia de trabalho)
@@ -2299,6 +2299,17 @@
public static boolean CUSTOM_MERCHANT_TABLES = true;
public static boolean ALLOW_SIMPLE_STATS_VIEW;
public static boolean ALLOW_DETAILED_STATS_VIEW;
+ //By Jonas
+ public static long ALT_STOP_MOVE_DELAY;
+ public static long ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_BOW;
+ public static long ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_OTHER;
+ public static long ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_MAGIC;
+ public static long ALT_STOP_MOVE_DELAY_MAGIC;
+ public static long ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_WITH_ATKSPD;

public static boolean ALLOW_ONLINE_VIEW;
public static boolean WELCOME_HTM;
public static String ALLOWED_SKILLS;
@@ -2432,6 +2443,19 @@
ALLOW_DETAILED_STATS_VIEW = Boolean.valueOf(L2JFrozenSettings.getProperty("AllowDetailedStatsView", "False"));
ALLOW_ONLINE_VIEW = Boolean.valueOf(L2JFrozenSettings.getProperty("AllowOnlineView", "False"));

+ //BY JONAS
+ ALT_STOP_MOVE_DELAY = Long.parseLong(L2JFrozenSettings.getProperty("AltStopMoveDelay", "50"));
+ ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_BOW = Long.parseLong(L2JFrozenSettings.getProperty("AltAttackDelayBow", "50"));
+ ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_OTHER = Long.parseLong(L2JFrozenSettings.getProperty("AltAttackDelayOther", "50"));
+ ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_WITH_ATKSPD = Long.parseLong(L2JFrozenSettings.getProperty("AltAttackDelayWithAtkSpd", "50"));
+ ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_MAGIC = Long.parseLong(L2JFrozenSettings.getProperty("AltAttackDelayMagic", "50"));
+ ALT_STOP_MOVE_DELAY_MAGIC = Long.parseLong(L2JFrozenSettings.getProperty("AltStopMoveDelayMagic", "50"));
+
KEEP_SUBCLASS_SKILLS = Boolean.parseBoolean(L2JFrozenSettings.getProperty("KeepSubClassSkills", "False"));

ALLOWED_SKILLS = L2JFrozenSettings.getProperty("AllowedSkills", "541,542,543,544,545,546,547,548,549,550,551,552,553,554,555,556,557,558,617,618,619");
@@ -5465,6 +5489,55 @@
{
DM_REVIVE_DELAY = Long.parseLong(pValue);
}
+
+ //By jonas
+ else if(pName.equalsIgnoreCase("AltStopMoveDelay"))
+ {
+ ALT_STOP_MOVE_DELAY = Long.parseLong(pValue);
+ }
+
+ else if(pName.equalsIgnoreCase("AltAttackDelayBow"))
+ {
+ ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_BOW = Long.parseLong(pValue);
+ }
+
+ else if(pName.equalsIgnoreCase("AltAttackDelayOther"))
+ {
+ ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_OTHER = Long.parseLong(pValue);
+ }
+
+ else if(pName.equalsIgnoreCase("AltAttackDelayWithAtkSpd"))
+ {
+ ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_WITH_ATKSPD = Long.parseLong(pValue);
+ }
+
+ else if(pName.equalsIgnoreCase("AltAttackDelayMagic"))
+ {
+ ALT_STOP_MOVE_DELAY_MAGIC = Long.parseLong(pValue);
+ }
+
+ else if(pName.equalsIgnoreCase("AltStopMoveDelayMagic"))
+ {
+ ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_MAGIC = Long.parseLong(pValue);
+ }
+
+
+
+
else
return false;
return true;

Index: head-src/com/l2jfrozen/gameserver/model/L2Character.java
===================================================================
--- head-src/com/l2jfrozen/gameserver/model/L2Character.java (revisão 957)
+++ head-src/com/l2jfrozen/gameserver/model/L2Character.java (cópia de trabalho)
@@ -294,6 +294,11 @@

/** The _meditated. */
private boolean _meditated;
+
+ /**By Jonas*/
+ private boolean moved = false;
+ private boolean movedMagic = false;
+ private boolean movedDelay = true;

/** Zone system<br> x^2 or x*x. */
public static final int ZONE_PVP = 1;
@@ -1102,9 +1107,85 @@
_log.fine(getName() + " doAttack: target=" + target);
}

+ // Get the active weapon item corresponding to the active weapon instance (always equiped in the right hand)
+ L2Weapon weaponItem = getActiveWeaponItem();
+
+ //By jonas
+
+
+ if(isMoving() || getMoved() && weaponItem != null && weaponItem.getItemType() == L2WeaponType.BOW)
+ {
+ try
+ {
+ Thread.sleep(Config.ALT_STOP_MOVE_DELAY);
+ stopMove(null);
+ }
+ catch (InterruptedException e)
+ {
+ System.out.println("Houve uma falha com bow");
+ }
+
+ try
+ {
+ //Parou de atacar com bow
+ Thread.sleep(Config.ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_BOW);
+ }
+ catch (InterruptedException ex)
+ {
+ System.out.println("Houve uma falha com bow");
+ }
+ //Voltou a atacar com bow
+ setMoved(false);
+
+
+
+ }
+
+ if(isMoving() || getMoved() && weaponItem != null && weaponItem.getItemType() != L2WeaponType.BOW)
+ {
+ try
+ {
+ Thread.sleep(Config.ALT_STOP_MOVE_DELAY);
+ stopMove(null);
+ }
+ catch (InterruptedException e)
+ {
+ System.out.println("Houve uma falha sem bow");
+ }
+
+ try
+ {
+ //Parou de atacar sem bow
+ Thread.sleep(Config.ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_OTHER);
+ }
+ catch (InterruptedException ex)
+ {
+ System.out.println("Houve uma falha sem bow");
+ }
+ //Voltou a atacar sem bow
+ setMoved(false);
+
+
+ }
+
+ if(getPAtkSpd() > 500)
+ {
+ try
+ {
+ //Parou de atacar
+ Thread.sleep(Config.ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_WITH_ATKSPD);
+
+ }
+ catch (InterruptedException e)
+ {
+ System.out.println("Houve um erro (atkspd)");
+ }
+ }
+
if(target == null)
return;

+
if(isAlikeDead())
{
// If L2PcInstance is dead or the target is dead, the action is stoped
@@ -1217,9 +1298,7 @@
// Get the active weapon instance (always equiped in the right hand)
L2ItemInstance weaponInst = getActiveWeaponInstance();

- // Get the active weapon item corresponding to the active weapon instance (always equiped in the right hand)
- L2Weapon weaponItem = getActiveWeaponItem();
-
+
if(weaponItem != null && weaponItem.getItemType() == L2WeaponType.ROD)
{
// You can't make an attack with a fishing pole.
@@ -1790,6 +1869,31 @@
return;
}

+ //by j
+ if(isMoving() || getMovedMagic())
+ {
+ try
+ {
+ Thread.sleep(Config.ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_MAGIC);
+ stopMove(null);
+ }
+ catch (InterruptedException e)
+ {
+ System.out.println("Houve uma falha com bow");
+ }
+
+ try
+ {
+ //Parou de atacar com bow
+ Thread.sleep(Config.ALT_STOP_MOVE_DELAY_MAGIC);
+ }
+ catch (InterruptedException ex)
+ {
+ System.out.println("Houve uma falha com bow");
+ }
+ setMovedMagic(false);
+ }
+
if(isSkillDisabled(skill.getId()))
{
if(activeChar instanceof L2PcInstance && !(skill.getId() == 2166))
@@ -11256,4 +11360,25 @@
{
return _triggeredSkills;
}
+
+ public void setMoved(boolean x)
+ {
+ moved = x;
+ }
+
+ public boolean getMoved()
+ {
+ return moved;
+ }
+
+ public void setMovedMagic(boolean x)
+ {
+ movedMagic = x;
+ }
+
+ public boolean getMovedMagic()
+ {
+ return movedMagic;
+ }
+
}
Index: config/functions/l2jfrozen.properties
===================================================================
--- config/functions/l2jfrozen.properties (revisão 957)
+++ config/functions/l2jfrozen.properties (cópia de trabalho)
@@ -280,4 +280,38 @@
ProtectorSkillLevel = 13
ProtectorSkillTime = 600
# Npc Protector Message
-ProtectorMessage = Hey You!, Never Kill On This Area, Go Read The Rules!
\ No newline at end of file
+ProtectorMessage = Hey You!, Never Kill On This Area, Go Read The Rules!
+
+
+##############################################
+# CONFIGS FOR CRAZYWAR PVP #
+##############################################
+
+# Delay com bow
+AltAttackDelayBow = 50
+
+# Delay sem bow
+AltAttackDelayOther = 400
+
+# Delay magic
+AltAttackDelayMagic = 50
+
+# Delay for AtkSpd
+AltAttackDelayWithAtkSpd = 50
+
+# Delay For stopMove in attack
+AltStopMoveDelay = 300
+
+# Delay For stopMove in attack
+AltStopMoveDelayMagic = 500
+

Index: head-src/com/l2jfrozen/gameserver/network/clientpackets/MoveBackwardToLocation.java
===================================================================
--- head-src/com/l2jfrozen/gameserver/network/clientpackets/MoveBackwardToLocation.java (revisão 957)
+++ head-src/com/l2jfrozen/gameserver/network/clientpackets/MoveBackwardToLocation.java (cópia de trabalho)
@@ -125,6 +125,9 @@
double dx = _targetX - _curX;
double dy = _targetY - _curY;

+ //DELAY PARA ATACAR OU USAR SKILL NOVAMENTE DEPOIS DE ARDAR
+ activeChar.setMoved(true);
+ activeChar.setMovedMagic(true);
// Can't -ni
if (activeChar.isOutOfControl() || dx * dx + dy * dy > 98010000) // 9900*9900
{


if(isMoving() || getMovedMagic())
+ {
+ try
+ {
+ Thread.sleep(Config.ALT_ATTACK_DELAY_MAGIC);
- stopMove(null);
+ }
Ou remove o método stopMove(null)

 

 

[Williams]

I corrected this but the way you took the Frozen example is not the best way to correct it in PlayerAI, good luck.

[Hash]

13 hours ago, Williams said:

I corrected this but the way you took the Frozen example is not the best way to correct it in PlayerAI, good luck.

I tried a lot of things and in my case nothing work as expected. The problem is walk and hit a lot of times, thats make an multiply of your attack speed. Seens like an easy problem, but i work on this for months and cant solve yet.

[Tryskell]

Thread.sleep should never been used like that, it's the worst you can do.

Dig into lack of synchronization, maybe. Set _isAttackingNow/_isCastingNow to AtomicBoolean, add synchronized over _moveTask if there's not.

Normally, setIntention is synchronized and it's impossible to override it. Another explanation is maybe your atkspd is too big than it generates very, very little tasks timers. Lower than 40ms (depends about your CPU cycle), timers got no guarantee to be properly managed if it uses System.currentTimeInMillis.

[Hash]

On 1/7/2024 at 6:26 PM, Tryskell said:

Thread.sleep should never been used like that, it's the worst you can do.

Dig into lack of synchronization, maybe. Set _isAttackingNow/_isCastingNow to AtomicBoolean, add synchronized over _moveTask if there's not.

Normally, setIntention is synchronized and it's impossible to override it. Another explanation is maybe your atkspd is too big than it generates very, very little tasks timers. Lower than 40ms (depends about your CPU cycle), timers got no guarantee to be properly managed if it uses System.currentTimeInMillis.

My version of aCis is 382, so I don't have these variables in my review. However, I changed the intentions to synchronized, which already improved part of the process, but unfortunately it didn't fix it. I also checked version 401 to see if it contained the _isAttackingNow variable, but it doesn't either, and moveTask is a complete class, meaning it's not possible to change just one method, unless you're talking about the moment the task was created. I really need help with this, I've been dealing with this for months and haven't been able to resolve it, and it has a huge impact on the gameplay on my servers. This way, if anyone is interested in helping me, I am willing to resolve it.

 

@edit

If i have to change my aCis version, that is not an problem.

Edited January 9, 2024 by Hash

[Katara512]

sounds like there are two different attack intentions, try to find the usages of the intention, keep in mind that isAttacking doesnt return the correct value in most cases so a quick approach for that is to get the AI of the attacker first 

Edited January 12, 2024 by Katara512

[Psygrammator]

On 1/7/2024 at 3:11 AM, Hash said:

Я разрабатываю сервер ультрастатуса, используя ревизию L2jAcis, но после определенной скорости атаки становится возможным прослушивать ваши атаки, и вы начинаете атаковать с экспоненциальной скоростью. Хотелось бы узнать, разработал ли кто-нибудь уже мод, разрешающий эту ситуацию, что-то похожее на то, что было разработано для l2jfrozen.

 

 

Вот пример замороженного кода. Я пытался перенести этот код в aCis, но ничего не вышло.

 

 

The problem is the reuse bow attack in this code. You must rewrite this point.
For servers with large stats, you need to rewrite the function with attack reuse. For correct operation

_disableBowAttackEndTime

Edited January 12, 2024 by Psygrammator

[Hash]

I tested on version 398 of aCis and the problem does not occur. From what I verified, the attack process and intentions were modified in version 389 of aCis, but I cannot find the diff with this modification to apply in my review. I believe that really the only way to adjust this is to change the way intentions are generated and the way attacks and conjurations happen.

[leakers2]

On 1/26/2024 at 5:25 PM, Hash said:

I tested on version 398 of aCis and the problem does not occur. From what I verified, the attack process and intentions were modified in version 389 of aCis, but I cannot find the diff with this modification to apply in my review. I believe that really the only way to adjust this is to change the way intentions are generated and the way attacks and conjurations happen.

I also need help with this, did you manage to solve it?

[optimousprime]

Hello there is any one somewhere shorting this problem ? One Acis rev 382. 

[Tryskell]

You shouldn't use rev 382, not sure why everyone keep using that.

 

I don't make changesets for fun, I don't make new revisions for nothing.

 

Follow the revisions.

[Williams]

On 1/2/2026 at 10:25 PM, Tryskell said:

Você não deveria usar o Rev 382, não entendo por que todo mundo continua usando isso.

 

Não faço mudanças por diversão, não faço novas revisões à toa.

 

Siga as revisões.

better than using 409...

On 11/10/2025 at 4:54 AM, optimousprime said:

Hello there is any one somewhere shorting this problem ? One Acis rev 382. 

Search for L2jHellas or Lucera and you won't have any headaches.

[Tryskell]

6 hours ago, Williams said:

better than using 409...

Search for L2jHellas or Lucera and you won't have any headaches.

 

Care to detail why ?

 

L2JHellas probably got the same issue, it's inherent to L2J if you don't rework Player intentions (and solving it with a Config < 500 attack is stupid, if it works for attack it works for other types of desires), also last time I checked L2JHellas he was using my changesets to fix its own stuff (which is ok, copy-paste my knownlist system which is 10y old is fine, but don't say it will act different since it's literally the same sub-system).

 

About Lucera code source isn't available so it's easy to say it's better, internally you got no clue what is happening and RU forks got the "feeling" to get everything, but everything is half done, everytime I put an eye on such sources (whatever based on l2ru, they only know how to copy-paste each other).

 

In the other hand, you seem to use aCis since years (I think I see your name since a decade, and you still use it since you made this topic :

 

Be a little more appreciative about the work done, it's not only mine but my community aswell, and if you find something, consider to report rather than getting such an idiotic behavior.

 

I understand you're not forced to share any type of fixes, and than people tend to feel superior when they fix something than aCis didn't yet fix. The thing is, for each bug you found, I found and fixed 10x more than you.

 

409 is way beyond 382 in all possible ways, if you believe the versus good for you, but don't make ppl believe it's the case, because it's not. There's at least 400+ fixed issues (and that's counting 10 issues by revision, which is kinda low) and entire new systems (spawns, SCHs, pathfind, whole AI implemented, Desire system,...).

Edited January 5 by Tryskell

[Nightw0lf]

aCis (“another Crappy interlude server”) is a commercial project I would not use even if paid.
l2jfrozen yes, a 10 year old, effectively dead project produces more reliable results and at least works.
l2jhellas also works.
aCis might as well be renamed KPMIS (“Keep Paying My Interlude Server”): endless fixes, freemium, and no realistic path to true L2OFF parity, but its recommended like hell.
lucera is even better the downside is you just need to dive into code and no sources

 

On 1/3/2026 at 3:25 AM, Tryskell said:

You shouldn't use rev 382

lets leave it at that

[Williams]

15 hours ago, Tryskell said:

 

Care to detail why ?

 

L2JHellas probably got the same issue, it's inherent to L2J if you don't rework Player intentions (and solving it with a Config < 500 attack is stupid, if it works for attack it works for other types of desires), also last time I checked L2JHellas he was using my changesets to fix its own stuff (which is ok, copy-paste my knownlist system which is 10y old is fine, but don't say it will act different since it's literally the same sub-system).

 

About Lucera code source isn't available so it's easy to say it's better, internally you got no clue what is happening and RU forks got the "feeling" to get everything, but everything is half done, everytime I put an eye on such sources (whatever based on l2ru, they only know how to copy-paste each other).

 

In the other hand, you seem to use aCis since years (I think I see your name since a decade, and you still use it since you made this topic :

 

Be a little more appreciative about the work done, it's not only mine but my community aswell, and if you find something, consider to report rather than getting such an idiotic behavior.

 

I understand you're not forced to share any type of fixes, and than people tend to feel superior when they fix something than aCis didn't yet fix. The thing is, for each bug you found, I found and fixed 10x more than you.

 

409 is way beyond 382 in all possible ways, if you believe the versus good for you, but don't make ppl believe it's the case, because it's not. There's at least 400+ fixed issues (and that's counting 10 issues by revision, which is kinda low) and entire new systems (spawns, SCHs, pathfind, whole AI implemented, Desire system,...).

Your work is as good as your arrogance. If you didn't break 10 systems to fix 1, I would recommend aCis. Yes, I use aCis and I fixed a lot of things that you left aside to reorganize and rename things. You insist on recommending your broken public project. Don't do that because there are many people who dream of owning a server, and in aCis 409 every dream is broken. I've seen many people break things by using this. aCis 409 doesn't work at the basics.

Water movement and flying movements are broken, which is the basics. Seven Sings is completely broken, Sieges need fixing, and worst of all, level 3 and 4 clan quests are bugged, besides other quests that you intentionally broke and still recommend. You are an excellent programmer, but your arrogance in feeling superior to everyone is killing you. Happy New Year to you, and be more transparent and honest when recommending this. I'm not sharing the corrections I made, nor my Geodata system, precisely because of your arrogance. I'll soon post a video of my Geoengine system, which you spent 12 years on and didn't finish.

I can send you a list of everything you need to fix, but you're too arrogant for that because you're a superior God and don't accept advice from mortals.

[Huggo]

Frozen is more popular coz adm can edit npc from client side and no need dig in xml and etc  )