Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Bots prevention system, version 2.0!
authors: @Agent @Caparso
---
history of this project reaching back to 2015 and we are back in the business!
special credits goes to: @Tryskell @Rootware @Hasha @SweeTs
(each of them brought something to this project, in the present or in the past - we simply won't let it go)

 

how does it work?
prevention system was designed to put an end to unfair practices during farming process.
extermination of monsters triggers an event with an limited time in order to validate human being behaviour, player have to choose corresponding pattern to match the randomly generated image. smooth and easy to solve for the human eye, doesn't bother the players much - as simple as possible!

 

new version brings:

  • more improvements and safeguards against attempts to bypass validation process (we are still working to make it even better in the future).
  • visual changes supporting new behaviours and more user-friendly solutions, but is also better from an admin point of view (main concept remains the same and no client-side modifications are needed).
  • an eye on players involving summons/pets into farming process.
  • possible checks against supports. system counts party kills adjusting the counter based on the number and type of professions of the characters in the party, then triggers a verification process for selected classes of your choice (available variations: PP, SWS, BD, EE, SE, BP, WC, OL).
  • rewarding system awards player with a selected type of item for passing the validation process correctly (we want to make lineage world a better place, so the whole process give in-game event vibes).
  • visible countdown and additional safe period of time, giving the player some extra seconds to adapt to the situation.
  • opportunity to allow a second attempt, so player can try one more time in case of incorrect verification.
  • adaptation to acis' latest public branch (commit 401) - neat code, minimally violates existing source.
  • most features can be turned on/off via configuration files, it's a matter of how much control you want to have over farming areas - the decision is yours!

some screens:

https://i.postimg.cc/vBXMxT8R/event.gif
https://i.postimg.cc/VkPT111X/punishment.gif

 

code preview? check it out on pastebin.
patch: bots_prevention_system.patch
put necessary prevention folder to: datapack/data/html/mods/

 

Edited by Caparso
update resource links.
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)

To detect players using Adrenaline, you can implement a system that monitors game activity and identifies patterns of behavior that are indicative of botting. To detect these patterns, you can implement algorithms that analyze player behavior and flag any instances that deviate significantly from what is considered normal. Additionally, you can also gather data on known botting software and their behavior patterns, and use this information to develop more sophisticated detection algorithms.

I'm not judging your share, just thinking out loud. 🙂

Edited by Trance
  • Upvote 1
Posted

adrenaline's authors are smart and highly experienced, plus with a proper tools you can bypass almost everything. we spend a lot of time in order to make this system functional and user-friendly. there are way more better solutions to fight with bots, but most of the time it also a big deal for normal players and it hits 'em in the face somehow. in my opinion nowadays mmorpgs are semi-automatic where word semi is so important in this puzzle. we still want players to be a part of the game so they have to keep an eye on their bots while farming!

Posted (edited)

i all ready applied mine 😄 . but i wasn't sure if its needed! 

 

            //custom
            BotsPreventionManager.getInstance().cleanUp();
            LOGGER.info("Bots Prevention tasks has been stopped.");

 

 

Edited by andy1984
Posted
On 2/11/2023 at 3:16 AM, Caparso said:

adrenaline's authors are smart and highly experienced, plus with a proper tools you can bypass almost everything. we spend a lot of time in order to make this system functional and user-friendly. there are way more better solutions to fight with bots, but most of the time it also a big deal for normal players and it hits 'em in the face somehow. in my opinion nowadays mmorpgs are semi-automatic where word semi is so important in this puzzle. we still want players to be a part of the game so they have to keep an eye on their bots while farming!


My reply is strictly referring to server side.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

@Caparso for acis 382 does not have the distance2D method which can be used to replace it?

image.thumb.png.b2ca21698cdd0354ef355e905f4add24.png

Just now, jhonata123 said:

@Caparso for acis 382 does not have the distance2D method which can be used to replace it?

image.thumb.png.b2ca21698cdd0354ef355e905f4add24.png

 

Posted
17 hours ago, jhonata123 said:

@Caparso for acis 382 does not have the distance2D method which can be used to replace it?

You can use with MathUtil.checkIfInRange instead of distance2D. 

Posted

hey,

 

On 3/7/2020 at 4:08 PM, Tryskell said:

Changeset 389 (1660)

       - Rework Point2D / Location distance methods ; they are now called distance2D/distance3D and isIn2DRadius/isIn3DRadius for proper usage.

Posted
1 hour ago, 'Baggos' said:

You can use with MathUtil.checkIfInRange instead of distance2D. 

 

1 hour ago, Caparso said:

hey,

 

 

thanks I ended up finding it here on acis 382.

 

if (player.isInsideRadius(member, 2000, false, false))

  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
    • ## [1.4.1] - 2026-01-29   ### ✨ New Features - **Short Description**: Server owners can add a short tagline (up to 240 characters) on the server info page, under the "Online" status. It appears in the server list (By Votes) for VIP, Gold VIP, and Pinned servers so players see a brief summary at a glance.   ### 🔄 Improvements - **Server Info Page**: Description field is limited to 3000 characters with a character counter; the textarea is vertically resizable. A second **Save Changes** button was added at the bottom (after the description) for easier saving. - **Server Name**: In My Servers → Edit, the server name is read-only and can no longer be changed (avoids accidental changes and naming conflicts). - **Server Rows (By Votes)**: Short descriptions wrap correctly and no longer affect row height; long text is clipped to two lines so the list stays tidy and consistent.   ---
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..