Jump to content
  • 0

Question

Posted

Hello i started to test Lineage  2 off server,and i noticed that then you casting a skill for example like Sorcerer prominence,first spell its castings fast but second one and later ones its slower,but then you starting a little bit moving casting normal agian,so my question, does this thing is a bug? or its feature from official and legit? because its  a bit annoying,and if its legit why they done like this? ;D

 

 

Thanks for answer :)

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

Issue is in GF and earlier servers L2server waits for a response from cached in DB interaction/item consumption before allowing L2Server to apply the spiritshot, as far as i know, You can skip this wait interaction, by forceing the i_spirit_shot skill effect on item use, with an extender to remove this delay.

  • Upvote 2
  • 0
Posted

It's the infamous l2off spiritshot lag. Some say it was a bug, some claim it was a feature to avoid nuke spamming. Not sure what the current status on ncsoft servers is now, but I believe this bug/feature did exist till freya/h5.

  • 0
Posted
2 hours ago, Blitzkrieg said:

It's the infamous l2off spiritshot lag. Some say it was a bug, some claim it was a feature to avoid nuke spamming. Not sure what the current status on ncsoft servers is now, but I believe this bug/feature did exist till freya/h5.

Question,does this thing fixable?

  • 0
Posted
7 hours ago, faintlt said:

Question,does this thing fixable?

 

it is i saw on l2off servers where i played no such issue probably ppl who manage l2off know how to fix ss animation delay 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..