Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Server Rates:

 

- 5000x EXP

 

- 5000x SP

 

- 7000x Adena

 

- 125x Drop

 

- 10000x Quest Reward

 

 

 

Site: PVP Server

 

 

 

epeksa k edo me 2 terata piga 50 lvl k den eixa frago oute na figo apo to starting town

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Yes but not many mobs give u adena. I usually get 0 adena from each mob if its lower lvl than me, so whats the point... Most of the mobs give 0 adena when u are more lvl, and since u lvl so fast all mobs are lower lvl than you= no adena...

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I m play on this server is nice but there are to mach rossians and they have ruin the server beacause they cheat have oll there items +25

 

and kill you for fun

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
I m play on this server is nice but there are to mach rossians and they have ruin the server beacause they cheat have oll there items +25

 

and kill you for fun

 

 

 

No....its to easy to have everything overenchanted..you dont need any cheat!!!

 

I broke my hero sword at +47!!!

 

 

 

You just go in TOI 6th floor and get 25-40m from each mob...then..you go to gmshop and star overenchanting...:)

Posted

kialles if only you can tell us how you got a +47 weapon when limit is +25 ...we won't call you "n00b"

 

(and no i dotn believe Gm gave ti to you cause you wouldnt echant it more and no i don't believe you are such a great hacker you did it by hacking the server)

Posted

LooooL....Yes..i am a noob..:P

 

+47 was on this server http://www.l2-freedom.com/index.php Its x7000 and i think there is no limit to overenchant.. A friend of mine has a weapon at +65!

 

 

 

On ael i only have my hero sword at +10 but the bug at TOI 6th floor still exists.. :)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..