Jump to content

We are a little team dev passionate, and we want to make Lineage 2 decent for the community  

14 members have voted

  1. 1. You can check multiple choices and also suggest us more choices!

    • Money : No Donation
      5
    • Security : 1 IP /character
      3
    • Chronicle : Interlude?
      4
    • Chronicle : H5?
      8
    • Chronicle : Classic?
      1
    • Merge best stuff from C4 to GOD(exlude) ?
      4
    • Active GM?
      8
    • Rates : 3x ?
      4
    • No limit lvl in party : helping your friends to lvl up?
      3
    • Transparancy : Public adenas Transaction?
      1
    • Transparancy : Public adenas classement?
      1
    • Transparancy : TimePlayed ?
      2
    • Let us know if you want more features !
      1
    • GameContent : Custom competition? instances with waves?
      5


Recommended Posts

Posted

We are a little team dev passionate, and we want to make Lineage 2 decent for the community.

Let us know what features and ideas you would like to implement.

we will update the poll 

Thanks you

 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Nowadays H5 Must be default player's choice because most of the H5 projects doesn't have updated files or most of them are outdated... Also most of the H5 servers got the same kind of events(russian roulette) (clan vs clan) etc... I think that new events could improve the gameplay + client side though....

Posted
10 minutes ago, Vince* said:

Nowadays H5 Must be default player's choice because most of the H5 projects doesn't have updated files or most of them are outdated... Also most of the H5 servers got the same kind of events(russian roulette) (clan vs clan) etc... I think that new events could improve the gameplay + client side though....

 

 

What do you mean by H5 files are outdated? Every current serious project has nearly everything H5 could/should have. Maybe outdated in terms of the client being anctient. :)

Posted
1 minute ago, Finn said:

 

 

What do you mean by H5 files are outdated? Every current serious project has nearly everything H5 could/should have. Maybe outdated in terms of the client being anctient. :)

Most of those projects due to their low traffic for any reason such as services price or setup price, they give up and they doesn't keep their project files or services updated...

Posted
14 minutes ago, Vince* said:

Nowadays H5 Must be default player's choice because most of the H5 projects doesn't have updated files or most of them are outdated... Also most of the H5 servers got the same kind of events(russian roulette) (clan vs clan) etc... I think that new events could improve the gameplay + client side though....

Thanks you for your answer and informations. I was not expecting answers so fast!

May you ask your E-L2-Friends also who can help us to gather informations?

 

Thanks you,

Br

Posted

one interlude server would be nice with mid rates hard core economy or smth like that every server that opens on 2020 is p2w or p2p idk owners are the worst now days they do not care for players but only for their own selves there was many good projects but after a while they got destroyed by bad decisions etc

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Celestine said:

one interlude server would be nice with mid rates hard core economy or smth like that every server that opens on 2020 is p2w or p2p idk owners are the worst now days they do not care for players but only for their own selves there was many good projects but after a while they got destroyed by bad decisions etc

Yeah I understand you 1000% about P2W/P2P, our goal is to see Lineage 2 Shining again. It's now more than  10 years we want to see a lineage 2 server like C4 time. 

 

About Interlude, what do you think about the latest client fufarion/classic but with interlude content ?

About allowing 1 adresse IP, what do you think also? we want this to avoid trains.

For finding party activity, we will make party matching and also advanced on the website to suggest activity between players.

 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Just don't open aother crappy interlude server! No I'm not flaming acis xD It's just because the client is outdated! Use one of the new clients and downgrade them to your target chronicle. This way you do not need to pay people for custom weapons, maps, clientfixes bcs win10+ or whatever.

 

Just take a newer client and customize it. The oldest client that actually could be used for this should be H5. For the new ones....depends on you which one you prefer, because of the interface changes.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

most of people want back the nostalgia now days and not another star wars client trust me with a interlude server u can bring many people if you know what you are doing 

Posted

Well you dont need to use those "starwars" armors/items since they are optional when u use a new client.

Posted
33 minutes ago, GmHowdi said:

Thanks for your answer guys, yes we share same view, that using fresh client but using old chronicles content.

 

And also use new armors as skins

 

sounds like a plan waiting to see more wish you good luck :)

Posted (edited)

Umm.. you are L2Spirit server that is 9999x and open/closed every 2 months for last few years? Opens again in 2 days...

Edited by L2who
Posted
1 hour ago, L2who said:

Umm.. you are L2Spirit server that is 9999x and open/closed every 2 months for last few years? Opens again in 2 days...

 

Im not! 

you know server names.... lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..