Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello

Well, since Reputation System on this forum is broken and - supposedly - it was going to be disabled after latest update,, I have a simply suggestion:
- since Reputation System should award active / sharing community members then:

1. Only Author inside his own topics can RECIVE Reputation Points (at first post only) - for his share.
2. Only Author of the topic can GIVE Reputation Point to ONE USER inside his topic - in case someone solve his problem or gave him a good advice.

NO OTHER OPTIONS TO GIVE OR RECIVE Reputation Points.

 

No more random +/- Reputation Points from random posts.

 

On 4.03.2017 at 11:29 AM, Maxtor said:

 

 

Posted (edited)

I don't think it's good solution, but i think limiting reputation points that user can give per day and also make it only for few sections since i see alot of rep points in Spam Topics which is really reduce the value of of it, and it's not important for anyone now +100 points == -100 points , currently reputation represent nothing.

 

Also i suggest having a Section for suggestions....

Edited by SamDev-Coder
Posted

Well, tbh before the upgrade to ips aVVe (or someone else, don't really remember atm) made a topic about the negative reps and because the reputation system was about to change we did no action to fix them. Now the old reps still exists, i guess a clean up on those spam reps would be a nice idea. On the other hand, giving tons of negative reputations because of a "fight" between members won't really give us the whole picture about how many reputation points someone should have or not.

Posted

It's not about fights, it's about false feedback - why ppl should give themself +1 rep in Spam Section? Random posts with idiotic meaning. Reputation System should be an award for ACTIVE members of the community, not random trolls posting stupid links.
If "Feedback System" is good for users who sells theirs works then "Reputation System" should be available ONLY for Authors - who shares stuff, and NOT for trolls who gives each other +1 becuase they shit on other ppl posts. Do You know what I mean?

If Maxtor want to keep this Rep System and the numbers of +'s should mean something, then he need to give this system a proper fix. If "Feedback System" is for sellers, then "Reputation System" is for active members - so as I've saide, it should be BASED on Authors and theirs topics. Autor can recive Rep Points (but only at first post on the topic), and only Authors can give Rep Point (one per topic) to "thank" someone for help. PERIOD.

Posted
4 hours ago, aVVe said:

It's not about fights, it's about false feedback - why ppl should give themself +1 rep in Spam Section? Random posts with idiotic meaning. Reputation System should be an award for ACTIVE members of the community, not random trolls posting stupid links.
If "Feedback System" is good for users who sells theirs works then "Reputation System" should be available ONLY for Authors - who shares stuff, and NOT for trolls who gives each other +1 becuase they shit on other ppl posts. Do You know what I mean?

I totally get and agree with what you said.

 

4 hours ago, aVVe said:

If Maxtor want to keep this Rep System and the numbers of +'s should mean something, then he need to give this system a proper fix. If "Feedback System" is for sellers, then "Reputation System" is for active members - so as I've saide, it should be BASED on Authors and theirs topics. Autor can recive Rep Points (but only at first post on the topic), and only Authors can give Rep Point (one per topic) to "thank" someone for help. PERIOD.

Unfortunately there is no option of doing something like that. I mean we can make it so people can rep + or - to topic authors and only that but there is no option of allowing rep to authors and only to one reply (for posts like a solution that helped someone) and Maxtor increased the maximum amount of reputations users can give in order to reward active people, he even gave normal members that option something that didn't exist on the previous versions not even on SMF with the Karma system. The fact that people abuse this, it's member's option to abuse this system but what we can do? "Punish" everyone by removing the reputation system because 2 or 3 users abuse the reputation system?

My opinion is to warn users abusing the reputation system and immediately remove every single rep this user gave and received no matter if it's negative or positive. 

Posted

Reactions should NOT influence the reputation system and true, ONLY the author of the topic should get reputation. Possibility to give karma/rep to any post, it's a crap. Else allow it for certain sections, like helping topics - sure thing, someone give a solution and boom, you can 'reward' him with reputation. That's legit.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Designatix said:

Unfortunately there is no option of doing something like that. I mean we can make it so people can rep + or - to topic authors and only that but there is no option of allowing rep to authors and only to one reply (for posts like a solution that helped someone) and Maxtor increased the maximum amount of reputations users can give in order to reward active people, he even gave normal members that option something that didn't exist on the previous versions not even on SMF with the Karma system. The fact that people abuse this, it's member's option to abuse this system but what we can do? "Punish" everyone by removing the reputation system because 2 or 3 users abuse the reputation system?

My opinion is to warn users abusing the reputation system and immediately remove every single rep this user gave and received no matter if it's negative or positive. 

Doesnt it work on L2JBrasil ? I know I saw it on one forum - some kind of restriction that only author can give +1 (or a beer :D) to other user for help, but on the other hand, only autr can recive rep point for sharing and such.

I guess SweeTs have a good point too - there is no need for random "thank You". I guess the rep system can work standalone for only authors - ppl who create and share stuff and only at first post of the topic.

Edited by aVVe
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • First, don't really follow the "main voice", moreover if you consider it an hobby. Simply do what you want, you got only one life so use it as you want. If you make it an hobby, it's exactly like piano, or velo - only practice makes you better.   Secondly, how do you learn things ? It's actually a really important question, since some can simply be scholar, read books (theory) then practice ; and some simply can't read books. I'm the second type, I hated school, I find it boring - my knowledge in Java comes from try-and-fail. You improve your coding style every year or so, I can myself rewrite my own code (which I already considered top-notched) after a while. You always learn something new - even if Java barely evolves. L2J is a fun way to learn programming, it's a giant sandbox where you can edit anything, and I believe it should be taken as it.   My own way of learning was as follow : Add existing customs, no matter what they are : the point is to know main classes used by L2J / customs. L2J is barely Java knowledge ; the true knowledge is to know WHAT to search in WHICH location (what I call, organization). You have to understand than EVERYTHING you think already exists, in a form on another, in the source code. A custom is only the association of the different mechanisms you found "here and there", glued together in a proper goal. Once you know main classes to edit, and the customs you added are compiling fine, the main point is to know WHAT exactly you DID. Try to understand WHY and WHERE you actually copied the code. Third point would be to MANIPULATE the customs you added in order to fit your wish. First edit little values, then logic conditions ; eventually add a new Config, or a new functionality to the custom. Fourth point would be to begin to craft your own ideas. Once again, EVERYTHING already exists, in a form or another. You want a cycled event ? You got Seven Signs main task as exemple. Npc ? Search any type of Npc and figure out what it does. Fifth point would be to understand Java - mostly containers (WHAT and WHERE to use them), variables types and main Java mechanisms (inheritance, static modifier, etc). You should also begin to cut your code into maintainable classes or methods. Java can actually run without optimization, but bigger your ideas, more optimized and well-thought it should be. It's direct saved time in the future, and you would thank yourself doing so. Main tips : ALWAYS use any type of versioning system - GIT or SVN. It allows to save your work, step by step and eventually revert back anytime you want if you terribly messed up. L2J is 80% organization knowledge, and 20% Java knowledge. Basically, if you know WHAT and WHERE to search, if you aren't dumb, it's easy to replicate and re-use things. Cherry on top is to use a already good coded pack to avoid copy-paste crap and get bad habits. Avoid any type of russian or brazilian packs, for exemple - their best ability is to leak someone's else code. Obviously you need some default sense of logic, but Java and programming in general help you to improve it.   Finally, most of your questions could be solved joining related Discord (at least for aCis, I can't speak for others) - from the moment your question was correctly asked (and you seemed to search for the answer). My community (and myself) welcomes newbies, but got some issues with noobies.   The simpliest is to try, fail and repeat until you succeed - it sounds stupid, but that's basically how life works.   PS : about Java ressources, before ChatGPT, it was mostly about stackoverflow website, and site like Baeldung's one. With ChatGPT and alike, you generally double-cross AI output to avoid fucked up answers. Also, care about AI, they are often hallucinating really hard, even today. They can give you complete wrong answer, you tell them they are wrong, and they say "indeed, I suck, sorry - here's a new fucked up answer". You shouldn't 100% rely over AI answer, even if that can give sometimes legit answers, full code or just skeletons of ideas.   PPS : I don't think there are reliable ressources regarding L2J itself, also most of the proposed code decays pretty fast if the source code is actually maintained (at least for aCis). Still, old coded customs for old aCis sources are actually a good beginner challenge to apply on latest source.
    • Add prices please.
    • WTS: - AQ - Baium - Zaken  - Frintezza - Vesper Fighter Focus Fire Element   pm for detalis
    • We have the best price! L2Reborn.org Signature x1 Franz NEW!! 1KK = $20 HURRY TO BUY AT THE TOP PRICE discord - adver745645
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock