Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I want to get busy wth l2classic client (at least with olympiads inside? ) what is the version of it ? and are any forks there public or private?

Posted

You meant, destroy the code and apply shitty codded custom ? Because it's the only reason L2J is on a hold. 99,9% lazy randomers, 0,1% dedicated devs.

 

beggar.jpg

Yeah, I agree with you. You know there is a philosophy that says "The Obstacle Is The Way". So my friend, with your knowledge and skills, you could bring a great new change and creative addition to l2j.

 

Why stick strictly to retail? When you could make some simple yet much-needed improvements by improvising code of your own.

 

The only reason "l2j is on hold" and "99% are lazy" is because few people have extensive Java programming knowledge and those who do are in demand - busy or expensive to hire.

 

I mean you should be done with "generic base" by now? aCis is the best l2j interlude pack... So the next big move is to combine Classic and Interlude

Posted

I mean you should be done with "generic base" by now? aCis is the best l2j interlude pack... So the next big move is to combine Classic and Interlude

 

Since Classic is still evolving, it's a waste of time developping it. You will end in the exact same situation than L2J, accumulating undone features. Moreover, no official dataleak means full custom data.

 

If by "generic base" you mean basic gameplay (talk / run / fight / buff), using any random L2J pack is enough for any of your needs.

Posted

Most of players and administrators don't care about retail working features, just about the client itself, I would say. So yeah, talk, run, attack, buff is pretty much OK :lol:

Posted

dat forum never stays on the subject! every topic i create and tryskell comment the topic ends for a general discuss of admins/lineage/acis.. can u just tell me??

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Nobody is gonna leak the source willingly, atm you have like up to 5 (and I was generous) who is developing classic classic, not interlude classic. 

It's like HF5 all over again, it will take atleast a year to see a decent source share around.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • To Finish this, because it's need a explanation   1. “I come to your forum” — It's the L2JMobius forum, not mine. I'm a contributor, not the owner or the maintainer responsible for deciding which fixes get committed.   2. “Which is why I left” — That's not an accurate account of what happened. You may have left voluntarily once, but you were also banned from the Discord server three times after repeatedly returning and causing the same disruptions. Those are not the same thing.   3. “You personally reply and reject that it works” — I asked how a negative withdrawal could be performed and later requested a demonstration of the claimed exploit. At no point did I reject the patch or claim the vulnerability was impossible. Asking for evidence is not the same as rejecting someone's work.   4. “You leave it unpatched for days” — I don't make that decision. Whether and when a patch gets committed is entirely up to the project maintainer, not me.   5. “You challenge me to post a video” — Yes, I asked you to demonstrate the exploit. You interpreted that as a rejection of your work, which it wasn't. Requesting proof of a claimed exploit is a perfectly reasonable part of technical discussion.   6. “Asshole-ness is a mutually contracted disease” — You're responsible for your own behavior, just as I'm responsible for mine. Disagreeing with you or questioning your claims doesn't justify personal insults. If you believe I've treated you unfairly, address what I actually said rather than making my behavior an excuse for yours.   And one question remains unanswered: why did you publicly disclose the exploitationmethod before the fix was released, after previously saying you wanted to avoid harming the project?   The vulnerability was real, the fix was accepted, and the commit was published. I have no problem acknowledging any of that.   My disagreement has never been about whether the bug deserved to be fixed. It's about how you've handled the discussion and repeatedly misrepresented my role in it.     I have nothing against you personally. My issue is with the way you conduct yourself in these discussions.   And no, you're not obligated to prove anything to me. However, when you make a technical claim, the burden of proof is on you. You cannot reasonably expect others to accept your claims without sufficient evidence.   Questioning a claim is not the same as rejecting it, nor is it a personal attack.   This isn’t about fanaticism; it’s about pushing back against the completely senseless attacks constantly leveled at the project as a whole.   It’s always the same thing: they badmouth it, claiming the project is worthless—yet the very same people criticizing it are the first in line to download a leaked version.   Enough is enough. This discussion has dragged on far too long over something that ought to be straightforward; if you’re going to submit a bug report, you should at least do it properly.
    • Mobius users develop a cult-like fanaticism towards the Hellenic overlord like how they do with pedric this should be something that is studied since it is truly so weird
    • I edited my reply cause it was too rude. But you had already answered.
    • As if I’m the one hiding behind alt accounts just to get attention.   Anyway, congratulations on the commit—that’s what you wanted, right?   P.S. Why did you edit your last reply? It’s pointless; it’s already quoted right there, in case you hadn’t noticed.   EOF
    • Let me think ...   I come to your forum, I send you a fix for the exploit. I do not mention that its exploit nor I say how to reproduce it cause Mobius got mad the last time this happened. You personally reply and reject that it works. Probably you didnt understood it.  But then again you personally have been an asshole to me for months in your shitty discord server (which is why i left). I reply back and hint you how it works without giving unnecessary details, you still dont understand. You leave it unpatched for days ... Then you come here mention me and challenge me to post a video of the exploit ...   Asshole-ness is a mutually contracted disease. If you stop being one, I can stop being one.     
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..