Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

This account was preordered with the digital collectors edition.

 

 

Rank:

 

Season 1: Silver

Season 2: Gold

Season 3: Diamond

Season 4: Unranked

Season 5: Silver

Season 6: Still unranked

 

Runes:

 

13 Rune pages

Almost every rune x9

 

968fc6c416504aa8856eec5e7959bd96.png

 

 

Skins:

 

Around 100+-

Too many legacy and unavailable skins from season 1/2 

(I cant use elophant for some reason atm , by the moment i can i will update the whole list for now ill put the most important ones "check in the spoiler)

 

 

8748a1575c9342ef804e78806e2ba20e.png
c37eeb55edf4446f9ff7bc52acb7969b.png
e2aa91cb6a974e99886392d24a167ce8.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For any more questions or further discussion(payment options/more screens etc.) , drop me a pm here in forum first.

I wont trade it for any other account or similar bs .

Retarded pm's will be deleted without any further notice.

 

 

PRICE

 

It wont be lower than 400$.

 

 

 

 

Come at me

:troll:

Edited by `Sanctus
Posted (edited)

It wont be lower than 400$.

 

http://www.bestprice.gr/item/2154662039/apple-iphone-6s-16gb.html?qid=370KtevWkYC_cde0d_806&seq=1#item-features

 

 

 

Les na uparxoun akoma UFO pou na dinoun 400 gia teliwmeno game?

 

:dat:

Edited by bravetobe
Posted

Ama breis,traba kai ena print kai steile m.

 

Pane playerauctions mpas kai breis giati 400 e apo MXC ...

Ama hmoun Lol mod 8a s ekana delete topic kai sto 2o ban Kappa

Posted

i know

to xw valei kai allou , apla why not kai dw .

 

ama mporousa na kana ban den tha zitousa demote kappa123

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..