Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 10 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 5 months later...
Posted (edited)

 

On 9/2/2015 at 12:33 AM, AchYlek said:
Spoiler

 

uses SysUtils;
 
 
 var tmpDialog,tmpString:string;
 var posCaptcha, num1, num2, resultNum, count:integer;
begin
  while Engine.Status = lsOnline do begin
    tmpDialog := Engine.DlgText;
    if (Pos('Активирован штраф', tmpDialog) <> 0) then
begin
tmpString:='';
tmpDialog:=''; // Наверное на делфи это не нужно делать, но у меня привычка.
// Ищем капчу в диалоге
    tmpDialog:=Engine.DlgText;
    posCaptcha:=pos('<font color=LEVEL>',tmpDialog);
posCaptcha:=posCaptcha+19;
 
 
// Выдираем 1 число из капчи 
while not (tmpDialog[posCaptcha] = ' ') do begin
tmpString:=tmpString + tmpDialog[posCaptcha];
posCaptcha:=posCaptcha + 1;
end;
num1:=StrToInt(tmpString);
 
 
// Выдираем 2 число из капчи 
tmpString:='';
posCaptcha:=posCaptcha + 3;
while not (tmpDialog[posCaptcha] = ' ') do begin
tmpString:=tmpString + tmpDialog[posCaptcha];
posCaptcha:=posCaptcha + 1;
end;
num2:=StrToInt(tmpString); 
 
 
// Решаем
resultNum:=num1 + num2;
print(IntToStr(resultNum));
 
 
// Отправляем ответ на капчу 
Engine.BypassToServer('00 '+IntToStr(resultNum), True); 
count:=count+1;
print ('Капча выскакивала -->'+IntToStr(count)+'<-- раз, но мы ее обошли =)');
end;
Delay (888);
end;
end.

 

 

 

On 9/2/2015 at 1:27 AM, Anitah said:

 

Where is the hack or something? :dat:

 

On 9/2/2015 at 9:41 AM, adr.bot said:

that guy captcha not dialog, i dont think if this works for him

 

On 9/3/2017 at 9:34 AM, fAkeN said:

PlaySound(exepath+'\sounds\'+'Alarm'+'.wav');

 

 

Hello people, sorry for bothering you and also for my english.. I was reading all the pages

 

I use l2 Adrenaline cracked version (1.71)

 

have this captcha to resolve

7a180e35fda26f806b80fb02402b6ed2o.jpg

 

I pasted the code in the "scripts" window of L2 adenaline

e86c8ee012253c372c9c16317edada92o.jpg

and I gave the "play" should it work?

 

am i doing things right? I'm new to adrenaline, and I don't know much about programming.

 

Could you add an alarm to this code? And let me know when I have to solve the captcha to do it personally?

 

I would really appreciate it if you give me a hand, greetings from the other side of the ocean!

Edited by briantispy
  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • TG Support: https://t.me/buyingproxysup | Channel: https://t.me/buyingproxycom Discord support: #buyingproxy | Server: Join the BuyingProxy Discord Server!  Create your free account here
    • I think you should check the video more carefully you missing something very important 😛      
    • Im responding to an anonymous account with 3 posts, almost no background, and practically zero useful information added to the discussion. On top of that, the topic title is misleading  calling it "Lucera Source Code" gives a completely different impression from what is actually being presented.   I didn’t say anything different. Therefore, I have no clue how his process produces the same desirable result.   And here you are creating drama. Your topic title clearly says "Lucera Source Code," which is not actually the case, or at least that’s how it looked when I first clicked on it, so I don’t think I was completely off. There’s also no significant information about your process like  what difficulties you faced, what tools you used, or anything else meaningful. Yet you still expect others to provide value based on what? I’m not talking about your project itself which, by the way, good job. I’m talking about the topic itself as a source of value for this forum, because right now it doesn’t really offer much in that regard. So regarding the semantics, yes, wording does matter.  
    • You are funny guy! 😄 😄 😄    I was working with Lucera long before “AI apps” became fashionable. This was not something I generated in one day with a prompt. It took me years of work, testing, debugging and fixing broken decompiled code.   Of course a decompiled source is not the original private repository with the original comments, history and developer structure. Nobody said it is the same Git repository. But saying it is only “guesses” is also wrong.   When you decompile, rebuild, fix thousands of compile/runtime issues, restore broken logic, reconnect scripts, fix bad casts, repair database calls, compile it again and run it in-game, at that point it is no longer just a guess.   It becomes a working reconstructed source base!   The important part is not whether it is byte-for-byte identical to the original private source. The important part is that I can now work directly inside the code, change core logic, rebuild scripts, fix bugs and continue development without being locked behind closed binaries.   Does it compile? Yes. Does it run in-game? Yes. Can I modify core systems directly? Yes. Can I continue development independently? Yes.   So call it reconstructed, decompiled, cleaned, restored or whatever name you prefer. The result is still the same: I have a working source environment that gives me control over the lucera2 project.   And that was exactly the goal!   🙂 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..