Jump to content
  • 0

Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted (edited)

 leech it from l2jhellas

 

 

yes

that system is shit. can vote only one by one and doesnt work with every ip. when server have 100+ ppl  online and want vote must wait for the other ppl for vote. if you want explain you better how that system works pm me for talk with you in Greek cuz my english are bad

Edited by nikosdevil20
  • 0
Posted

Thats how individual vote works, so dont busy. Mass/general reward is more important I guess.

is not usefull that system. cannot use on live server with 100 + ppl online. mass reward is more usefull and is already shared

  • 0
Posted

is not usefull that system. cannot use on live server with 100 + ppl online. mass reward is more usefull and is already shared

i know servers with 300 players that use this system and individual reward can't be done in another way except if you involve php...

  • 0
Posted

i know servers with 300 players that use this system and individual reward can't be done in another way except if you involve php...

 

i know servers with 300 players that use this system and individual reward can't be done in another way except if you involve php...

yes but as player is hard to wait all players to vote..

  • 0
Posted

yes but as player is hard to wait all players to vote..

they don't vote all together dude, if you have a problem you go farm or smth and then you come back there is very low chance that someone is always voting...

  • 0
Guest Elfocrash
Posted

the one by one checking is there for another reason. You can remove it and still the system will work fine. There will be another problem though. Thats what i encountered in previous version of the system while i was coding it. Try it.

  • 0
Posted (edited)

the one by one checking is there for another reason. You can remove it and still the system will work fine. There will be another problem though. Thats what i encountered in previous version of the system while i was coding it. Try it.

that system (for shared system i talk) doesnt check every ip if have voted... so if remove the check for 1 by 1 for example if 3 players vote at same time and 1 of 3 players vote correct and other players vote wrong (on captcha for example) 3 players take reward and not 1...so cannot remove the check

 

 

they don't vote all together dude, if you have a problem you go farm or smth and then you come back there is very low chance that someone is always voting...

 

as "server admin" or as "server developer" is not problem. but if you are a player that is a big problem..anyway. that is my opinion for that system. if that system have 1 ip check or something like this that is the best vote system for now. 

Edited by nikosdevil20
  • 0
Guest Elfocrash
Posted

that system (for shared system i talk) doesnt check every ip if have voted... so if remove the check for 1 by 1 for example if 3 players vote at same time and 1 of 3 players vote correct and other players vote wrong (on captcha for example) 3 players take reward and not 1...so cannot remove the check

Man i coded this thing and you are just a random. System does not need to check ip to do that but even if you want to remove the who is voting check you can still have everyone's ip checked.

the problem will be somewhere else.

  • 0
Posted

Man i coded this thing and you are just a random. System does not need to check ip to do that but even if you want to remove the who is voting check you can still have everyone's ip checked.

the problem will be somewhere else.

talk better because you think you are something here but you are only a shit. so dont talk about me. i talk for your shitty code of give random rewards to everyone. i have already test without 1 by 1 check and give rewards to everyone who vote the same time with wrong vote. what the fuck you dont understund from this?

  • 0
Posted

talk better because you think you are something here but you are only a shit. so dont talk about me. i talk for your shitty code of give random rewards to everyone. i have already test without 1 by 1 check and give rewards to everyone who vote the same time with wrong vote. what the fuck you dont understund from this?

mlka ti pineis? idi s eipe oti tha sinantiseis problima ama bgaleis to 1 by 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • I'll give you my wallet if you want, haha
    • To make up for some of the waiting time we’re hosting a 3v3 Tournament on open Beta, and this time we’re raising the stakes with a $1,300 prize pool 💰   🏆 PRIZE POOL BREAKDOWN (Over 2000$ Worth of prices total)   🥇 1st Place — $700 🥈 2nd Place —$300 🥉 3rd Place — $200 🏅 4th Place — $100  5th -6th Place - $100 in Gold Coins each    All Participating Teams: $50 in Gold!   All Prices will be Paid out instantly after the tour, no waiting time and conditions. This is not simply a marketing move, we want to give back to the community.   📅 Date: Wednesday 06.05.2026 ⏰ Time: 20:00 Central European Timezone (Berlin) 📍Format: 3v3   ⚔️Why join? Cash Prices for top 4 and rewards for all participants Payments to winners sent out straight after the tournament - No waiting time or rules that you have to play live server to obtain the reward. Clean format, smooth matches, and solid prize pool and a chance to experience our brand new files   📝How to join: Form your 3-player team Group Leader Sign up here: ⁠📍・3v3-tour-registration (Include Name of Group, Name of Group Leader)   Be ready on match day!     A separate post with rules for the tournament and class setups will follow shortly.   Tag your teammates, lock in your roster, and get ready to compete. We'll be happy to see you on the OBT!   💬 Questions? Ask in ⁠🎫・ticket or send us a message   See you on L2Dark! 😏   Discord: https://discord.gg/FAJwnFpb8M
    • You should check if that condition is supported by your current sources. You can find this in  DocumentBase#parsePlayerCondition If it isnt there and you want to follow the same pattern of the other item conditions, create a custom condition to parse the classId (or multiple class ids) (there are examples to copy the code). Alternatively, you can create your own condition handler. Your condition should look like this: <cond msgId="1518"> <player classId="ADVENTURER,PALADIN" /> </cond> or <cond msgId="1518"> <player classId="93,5" /> </cond>  
    • it's Interlude client forgot to mention
    • idk if acis have this option, but you can put inside item smth like that atleast on H5         <cond msgId="1518">             <player class_id_restriction="93, 101, 108, 117" /> <!-- Dagger Masters -->         </cond>
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..