-
Posts
-
To Finish this, because it's need a explanation 1. “I come to your forum” — It's the L2JMobius forum, not mine. I'm a contributor, not the owner or the maintainer responsible for deciding which fixes get committed. 2. “Which is why I left” — That's not an accurate account of what happened. You may have left voluntarily once, but you were also banned from the Discord server three times after repeatedly returning and causing the same disruptions. Those are not the same thing. 3. “You personally reply and reject that it works” — I asked how a negative withdrawal could be performed and later requested a demonstration of the claimed exploit. At no point did I reject the patch or claim the vulnerability was impossible. Asking for evidence is not the same as rejecting someone's work. 4. “You leave it unpatched for days” — I don't make that decision. Whether and when a patch gets committed is entirely up to the project maintainer, not me. 5. “You challenge me to post a video” — Yes, I asked you to demonstrate the exploit. You interpreted that as a rejection of your work, which it wasn't. Requesting proof of a claimed exploit is a perfectly reasonable part of technical discussion. 6. “Asshole-ness is a mutually contracted disease” — You're responsible for your own behavior, just as I'm responsible for mine. Disagreeing with you or questioning your claims doesn't justify personal insults. If you believe I've treated you unfairly, address what I actually said rather than making my behavior an excuse for yours. And one question remains unanswered: why did you publicly disclose the exploitationmethod before the fix was released, after previously saying you wanted to avoid harming the project? The vulnerability was real, the fix was accepted, and the commit was published. I have no problem acknowledging any of that. My disagreement has never been about whether the bug deserved to be fixed. It's about how you've handled the discussion and repeatedly misrepresented my role in it. I have nothing against you personally. My issue is with the way you conduct yourself in these discussions. And no, you're not obligated to prove anything to me. However, when you make a technical claim, the burden of proof is on you. You cannot reasonably expect others to accept your claims without sufficient evidence. Questioning a claim is not the same as rejecting it, nor is it a personal attack. -
Mobius users develop a cult-like fanaticism towards the Hellenic overlord like how they do with pedric this should be something that is studied since it is truly so weird -
I edited my reply cause it was too rude. But you had already answered. -
As if I’m the one hiding behind alt accounts just to get attention. Anyway, congratulations on the commit—that’s what you wanted, right? P.S. Why did you edit your last reply? It’s pointless; it’s already quoted right there, in case you hadn’t noticed. EOF
-
Let me think ... I come to your forum, I send you a fix for the exploit. I do not mention that its exploit nor I say how to reproduce it cause Mobius got mad the last time this happened. You personally reply and reject that it works. Probably you didnt understood it. But then again you personally have been an asshole to me for months in your shitty discord server (which is why i left). I reply back and hint you how it works without giving unnecessary details, you still dont understand. You leave it unpatched for days ... Then you come here mention me and challenge me to post a video of the exploit ... Asshole-ness is a mutually contracted disease. If you stop being one, I can stop being one.
-
-
Topics
-
Recommended Posts