Jump to content
MaxCheaters Official Group on Discord
-> Place your ad text here <-
LINEAGE2.GOLD INTERLUDE SERVER ON ESSENCE CLIENT

(L2J) MMOPLAY Dynamic Rates| Server Revamping! Back online Soon.

MMOPLAY

By MMOPLAY
in Private Servers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MMOPLAY Newbie

MMOPLAY

Posted
  • Author
Posted

It is important if this happens only against players cause this will create several problems. In fact the most important one is that there is usually less than 1% chance that a mob will actually win a battle against a player. Taking that into consideration there is a very high chance that all your work will end up having no point so this is something you should address.

 

Also if a mob kill another mob how exactly does it get stronger? is there a point to that? will it be more rewarding or just flat out harder for no reason? if all mobs are different will there be room for strategy or will it end up in players relying on pure strength to defeat mobs etc etc.

 

Im not trying to spoil it for you, im trying to adress isues that might pose a problem to the design.

Yes. Mobs can kill each other. Mobs can form alliances. Mobs will start forming own "clans". Mobs will evolve, finally mobs can invade. All depends on players, how they will control the situation. You will be able for example to steer mobs on other clans, use them as a tool on sieges, or make them fight each other. Ofc not all those features will be on right a way. That's why we put ".whatsnew" and ".soon" commands in game, accessible via player panel too, to show you what recently has been turned on and whats going to be tested next and when we plan to turn it on. You must understand, that this is a lot of work, over 2 years of development, that has been tested only in simulated situations, with no more than 30 people online...

 

Anyway, to make L2 people understand a little bit what we were working on, where we wanna go... It's not an official promo vid, it's not public (when promo vid is ready, you will be astonished ;P), however this might put some light on what I am talking about (watch full screen, HD):

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • Nightw0lf
      Attack Speed problem with ultra status server [aCis]

      By Nightw0lf · Posted

      aCis (“another Crappy interlude server”) is a commercial project I would not use even if paid. l2jfrozen yes, a 10 year old, effectively dead project produces more reliable results and at least works. l2jhellas also works. aCis might as well be renamed KPMIS (“Keep Paying My Interlude Server”): endless fixes, freemium, and no realistic path to true L2OFF parity, but its recommended like hell. lucera is even better the downside is you just need to dive into code and no sources   lets leave it at that
    • sitehunter
      Exelo Combo Tool v.2

      By sitehunter · Posted

      Download Here: https://sitehunterus.blogspot.com/2025/12/exelo-combo-tool-v2.html VirusTotal https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/2acd067847ee092c7986f55c9f77620d89505d1c0bda34a0ee8f55b9c2905c11?nocache=1 Visit my Blogger list to download 100% free software https://www.freetoolss.com/ https://blackhat8.blogspot.com/ https://hack-crack9.blogspot.com/ https://hackernoons.blogspot.com/ https://sharetools99.blogspot.com/
    • Tryskell
      Attack Speed problem with ultra status server [aCis]

      By Tryskell · Posted

      Care to detail why ?   L2JHellas probably got the same issue, it's inherent to L2J if you don't rework Player intentions (and solving it with a Config < 500 attack is stupid, if it works for attack it works for other types of desires), also last time I checked L2JHellas he was using my changesets to fix its own stuff (which is ok, copy-paste my knownlist system which is 10y old is fine, but don't say it will act different since it's literally the same sub-system).   About Lucera code source isn't available so it's easy to say it's better, internally you got no clue what is happening and RU forks got the "feeling" to get everything, but everything is half done, everytime I put an eye on such sources (whatever based on l2ru, they only know how to copy-paste each other).   In the other hand, you seem to use aCis since years (I think I see your name since a decade, and you still use it since you made this topic :   Be a little more appreciative about the work done, it's not only mine but my community aswell, and if you find something, consider to report rather than getting such an idiotic behavior.   I understand you're not forced to share any type of fixes, and than people tend to feel superior when they fix something than aCis didn't yet fix. The thing is, for each bug you found, I found and fixed 10x more than you.   409 is way beyond 382 in all possible ways, if you believe the versus good for you, but don't make ppl believe it's the case, because it's not. There's at least 400+ fixed issues (and that's counting 10 issues by revision, which is kinda low) and entire new systems (spawns, SCHs, pathfind, whole AI implemented, Desire system,...).
    • VPSLab
      — VPSLAB — Fast & Private RDP/VPS | 100% Instant Setup

      By VPSLab · Posted

      Active & Taking Orders!
    • Williams
      Attack Speed problem with ultra status server [aCis]

      By Williams · Posted

      better than using 409... Search for L2jHellas or Lucera and you won't have any headaches.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock