Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ello hell exist....Cause leavers-feeders etc exist too :p

So elo hell are the leavers.

 

 

 

 

WAIT WHAT

Posted

If you think elo hell exists then create a 5v5 team with people of your elo and try to beat people that have 100-200 elo more than you.

Posted

Actually elo hell seems to be the elo category where you deserve to be(kinda) and you cant go higher

 

You can't go higher cause in every game there is a feeder or leaver....That's why someone cant go higher...For me this is the reason...I give everything in game but i have noobs insult each other and feed..

Posted

If you think elo hell exists then create a 5v5 team with people of your elo and try to beat people that have 100-200 elo more than you.

Posted

There becomes a certain point where the team is too bad to be able to carry. So yea, elo hell exists.

^

 

There should not be a name of this situation because at the moment the 80% of the community believes that they are good and the others are bad. Meanwhile they may be correct , the others were bad , however people do not try to improve themselves because they tend to dig their badness with the mistakes of other people.

 

They do not care if they got grabbed by a blitz nearly every time , or that they get harassed by every skillshot the enemy Ezreal lands , because their top lost faster the turret than they did. So it's only top's fault. FACK YOU I RAPORT U IDIOT OMG. Shift + Enter REPORT DARIUS IDIOT play OP champ still lose...

 

It's a mix of bad/immature people abusing a bad matchmaking algorithm and being able to join a "competitive" level of game with nearly no requirements. That else do you expect then you only need sixteen champions to enter while you will have more till you reach level thirty because people tend to buy champions with their IP instead of runes since they do not understand Runes's value. There were a lot of bad decisions from Riot since they are bad then it comes to stuff like these. Like their forums , their client's programming stability/enrichment and security. Infinite Flashes/Heals/Smite all the way just by changing a mastery page value from client-side , hurray !

 

And since Riot doesn't want to improved Ranked Games (Lyte trying to fix it and it will take the same amοunt of time stealth rework did , just to fix some obvious mistakes) people should try to improve the situation by themselves , for starters by stopping giving a name to a magical place like elohell. The problem is on their brains comrades not in a zone. And sometimes you simply can't win the game if you got a mid who yelled for mid on champion selection "MID OR AFK" going AFK because the enemy jungler ganked him faster than his jungler , and he goes AFK because he is mad he is sad and he is full of failures because he is playing ranked for many hours in the row which builds that anger up and tends to throw it at his team , which only provokes a chaos making people write more than playing. It's not like people on solo queue want a lot of provoking to start flaming/marking you as a "troll".

Posted

There becomes a certain point where the team is too bad to be able to carry. So yea, elo hell exists.

 

That's when you reach the rating you deserve and simply can't carry easily anymore.

Posted

^

There should not be a name of this situation because at the moment the 80% of the community believes that they are good and the others are bad.

 

There is a name, it's called backwards rationalisation.

Posted

That's when you reach the rating you deserve and simply can't carry easily anymore.

 

But what if BY CHANCE you lose all 5 of your first matches that put you into a rating? So you end up at an extremely low ELO. But perhaps you're a better player than that and you just got unlucky on all 5 matches, or you was having a bad day etc.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • @ERROR501, I’ve been waiting for the “big update” since last October, and at this point, it’s starting to feel like an empty promise. You’re better off implementing your own minimum detection server-side instead of relying on AAC to fix their issues; despite what their website claims about blocking everything, it clearly falls short.
    • We are taking new orders. Kindly DM us on Telegram!
    • Hello everyone!  I’d like to share an experience that might serve as a lesson for anyone planning to work with third-party protection services—specifically, Active Anticheat. I know this might sound like a strange job request, but  our player base mostly consists of veteran of Lineage 2 players who are used to using bots as part of their gameplay experience. As server administrators, we decided to adapt to our users. That’s why we approached Active Anticheat with a proposal: Allow bot usage under certain conditions. We explained everything in detail, and they agreed.   📌 February – A Promising Start On February 16th, we contacted Active Anticheat to request a custom antibot system. The idea was to kick players using bots during specific times (like sieges), but allow them to log back in without bots afterward. After a few discussions, both sides agreed on the following solution: Bots allowed during regular days. During siege events, anyone using a bot would be automatically kicked. Kicked players could log back in without using bots. The deal was priced at $5,000, which we already paid on March 31st, 2025. Active Anticheat promised delivery by the end of April, or at the latest, by May. Screenshot:  Deal 1 Deal 2   🕐 May – The Delays Begin We followed up multiple times in May, only to finally hear back on May 26th: “It won’t be ready this month. But we’re working on a big update coming in June.” That update? Still nowhere to be seen, even as I’m writing this post. Screenshot:  Delayed   🔁 Plan B – L2Walker Rejected, Adrenaline Offered With our server launch schedule getting tighter, we needed an alternative. At the end of June, we asked Active Anticheat: “Can you at least allow L2Walker access to the server?” Their response on June 28th: “L2Walker can’t be allowed. But we can allow Adrenaline (free & paid version) and L2Helper for $2,000 + $300 (for a new license).” We agreed, hoping it would be a temporary fix while waiting for the promised “big update” (which we had already paid $5,000 for, remember?). Screenshot:  New Offer 1 New Offer 2 New Offer 3   ❌ AA Failed Their setup took about a week. We ran 2–3 rounds of testing using clean clients. The result? Adrenaline (both free and paid) couldn’t connect to our server. It couldn’t detect the Lineage 2 client, because the custom Active Anticheat protection was blocking it. We reached out to Active Anticheat for support, and their response? “You should contact Adrenaline support to enable free Adrenaline for your server. Adrenaline blocks it by default when Active Anticheat is detected.” Then we tested Premium Adrenaline. And it still didn’t work. Active Anticheat stood firm: “It’s not our fault. Adrenaline blocked us—not the other way around.” Screenshot: Failed 1 Failed 2   💸 The Bitter Reality Today, we’re still waiting for answers. No reply. No fix. No update. No refund. We’ve spent a total of $7,300 and received nothing functional in return. And this, despite their full agreement with our initial plan.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock