Tryskell Posted April 18, 2012 Posted April 18, 2012 Both are ugly and hard to read. I don't want to imagine the work it represents to change all those HTMs. Personally, I find it perfectly pointless. Another idea ? Make all words as a pixel art. Or translate all htms in hieroglyphs, for the art.
Darule Posted April 18, 2012 Posted April 18, 2012 The 1st one ofc! Question: How did you add custom image from the server-side?? :O DDS Converter, to add images from server. (worldwind.jar and jogl.jar) Both are ugly and hard to read. I don't want to imagine the work it represents to change all those HTMs. Personally, I find it perfectly pointless. Another idea ? Make all words as a pixel art. Or translate all htms in hieroglyphs, for the art. +1 1)The fact that you added an image on html might excite some newbies but still it doesnt look professional at all, at least for my taste. 2)These tables and the colors reminds me interlude (i dont have to say more), the tables are not aligned correctly and the colors could be way better.
SunBeam Posted April 18, 2012 Author Posted April 18, 2012 Chill ,i already said that i choosed "text only" ,different than classic ,better orders blabla
Destorion Posted May 24, 2012 Posted May 24, 2012 The first one rocks! But the last choice have got the owners of the servers..... ;) ;). But personally i choose the 1st
slayerofdark Posted June 6, 2012 Posted June 6, 2012 i know its old post . But one word K.I.S.S(keep it simple stupid)as like American's say !
DiNamO Posted June 9, 2012 Posted June 9, 2012 First one looks something new than simple html, but it takes client size. If you are not interested in the size of system, chose the first one.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now