Jump to content
MaxCheaters Official Group on Discord
Top.MaxCheaters.com is now OPEN – Lineage 2 Top Listing

[Help] System Protocol Revision

Gosling

By Gosling
in [Request] Client Dev Help

 Share

Recommended Posts

•MeLe• Newbie

•MeLe•

Posted
Posted

I Think Is From L2.Ini ... i cant help you very much wuth this

but... you can change is and from server side.. from pack..

say me your client and your pack to  help you :)

Gosling Newbie

Gosling

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I Think Is From L2.Ini ... i cant help you very much wuth this

but... you can change is and from server side.. from pack..

say me your client and your pack to  help you :)

I want to change it from client from system I checked l2.ini it hasnt to do with protocol :S

CriticalError Proficient

CriticalError

Posted
Posted

I Think Is From L2.Ini ... i cant help you very much wuth this

but... you can change is and from server side.. from pack..

say me your client and your pack to  help you :)

ahhh protocol revision of L2.ini puff fail!!!! to say random things to see if they hit, if they have no better idea say nothing, as fools are the protocol is changed from l2.exe for your information.
Dev Rookie

Dev

Posted
Posted

Does anyone know how can I change the protocol revision in the system ? How can I do this ? Thanks a lot

You can do that with hex coding. Just decrupt L2.exe and change the protocol number.

mcbigmac Newbie

mcbigmac

Posted
Posted

You can do that with hex coding. Just decrupt L2.exe and change the protocol number.

 

No.

 

And criticalerror - the irony of your statement was very funny.

This is why you'll never learn anything - such as unpacking.

Why post - if you don't personally know the information?

 

Your just spreading bullshit.

CriticalError Proficient

CriticalError

Posted
Posted

No.

 

And criticalerror - the irony of your statement was very funny.

This is why you'll never learn anything - such as unpacking.

Why post - if you don't personally know the information?

 

Your just spreading bullshit.

ok smart, you think is only way change protocol revision? I do with this way, you don't want belive is your problem, I know can do it and do it for 1 server GF, about the shit says about me, sure you were born knowing everything, never said anything and was always an expert, for persons like you like that we are nowadays.
mcbigmac Newbie

mcbigmac

Posted
Posted

ok smart, you think is only way change protocol revision? I do with this way, you don't want belive is your problem, I know can do it and do it for 1 server GF, about the shit says about me, sure you were born knowing everything, never said anything and was always an expert, for persons like you like that we are nowadays.

 

No, you can't.

 

 

Send me a proto 777 Gracia Final exe :)

 

I'll test if it works with forced proto enabled :O

Dev Rookie

Dev

Posted
Posted

No, you can't.

 

 

Send me a proto 777 Gracia Final exe :)

 

I'll test if it works with forced proto enabled :O

Instead of spamming why you don't say the alternative way if it is any ?  :o

CriticalError Proficient

CriticalError

Posted
Posted

Instead of spamming why you don't say the alternative way if it is any ?  :o

because the method used for him is disassemble l2.exe and change the variables right there, but it is only l2.exe you must modify the configuration of the server to take the new protocol.
mcbigmac Newbie

mcbigmac

Posted
Posted

Instead of spamming why you don't say the alternative way if it is any ?  :o

because the method used for him is disassemble l2.exe and change the variables right there, but it is only l2.exe you must modify the configuration of the server to take the new protocol.

 

 

Because changing whatever clients protocol, that is referenced in l2.exe won't do shit.

 

It takes proto from engine, but critical error is too newb and retarded to take the hint given.

 

As evident by his complete lack of understanding the client and how programs work on windows ;)

 

 

He even keeps just spurting a ton of shit and buzz words now instead of actually explaining anything.

 

"disassemble l2.exe and change the variables right there"

 

RIGHT THERE MAN, RIGHT THERE!!

 

You don't hear me talking about how to fix cars or do brain surgery, cause i read a wikipedia article about it.

Gosling Newbie

Gosling

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

Because changing whatever clients protocol, that is referenced in l2.exe won't do shit.

 

It takes proto from engine, but critical error is too newb and retarded to take the hint given.

 

As evident by his complete lack of understanding the client and how programs work on windows ;)

 

 

He even keeps just spurting a ton of shit and buzz words now instead of actually explaining anything.

 

"disassemble l2.exe and change the variables right there"

 

RIGHT THERE MAN, RIGHT THERE!!

 

You don't hear me talking about how to fix cars or do brain surgery, cause i read a wikipedia article about it.

You can go and fuck yourself annoying kid.

Any mod lock it. I appreciate mods try for help. Thx..

Dev Rookie

Dev

Posted
Posted

You can go and -beep- yourself annoying kid.

Any mod lock it. I appreciate mods try for help. Thx..

Done. You are welcome.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • prostsmm
      Boost Your SEO with Rankopti – Premium Backlinks, Keywords

      By prostsmm · Posted

      NEW UPDATES ! 
    • NeoPacket0041
      HQ Photoshop | Verify Accs KYC, AML | Antiban 100% | PSD Tem

      By NeoPacket0041 · Posted

      LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • Ave
      ⚜ Custom UPDATER / LAUNCHER ⚜

      By Ave · Posted

      IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • Databay
      █ 7,000,000+ RESIDENTIAL PROXIES ✅ FROM 0.65$ / GB █

      By Databay · Posted

      This is a bump: https://databay.com/
    • sandeagle
      CliExt.dll from Guytis IL Projects problem!!!

      By sandeagle · Posted

      i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..