Jump to content

[share] top200 botvoter...


crisbr002

Recommended Posts

tl;dr->this voter sucks.

 

I knew that voter was bad but I didn't know it was THAT bad...

 

For starters, it can only use HTTP proxies, which anyone with a brain will realize that HTTP proxies only make up at most a quarter of public proxies.

Then there is how it does HTTP requests, using a static language and accept header

request2.Headers.Add("Accept-Language: ru-RU");
request2.Accept = "application/x-ms-application, image/jpeg, application/xaml+xml, image/gif, image/pjpeg, application/x-ms-xbap, application/vnd.ms-excel, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/msword, */*";

 

Which is the easiest way for a site to tell if vote's are being botted or not, and when gs200 start checking, and I mean when, not if, then it will be pretty easy for them to find the idiots voting with this voter.

The only marginally good thing about this voter is that it uses random useragents, but that is counteracted by the supreme stupidity of not correctly url encoding the post data for the captcha solution and server name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tl;dr->this voter sucks.

 

I knew that voter was bad but I didn't know it was THAT bad...

 

For starters, it can only use HTTP proxies, which anyone with a brain will realize that HTTP proxies only make up at most a quarter of public proxies.

Then there is how it does HTTP requests, using a static language and accept header

request2.Headers.Add("Accept-Language: ru-RU");
request2.Accept = "application/x-ms-application, image/jpeg, application/xaml+xml, image/gif, image/pjpeg, application/x-ms-xbap, application/vnd.ms-excel, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/msword, */*";

 

Which is the easiest way for a site to tell if vote's are being botted or not, and when gs200 start checking, and I mean when, not if, then it will be pretty easy for them to find the idiots voting with this voter.

The only marginally good thing about this voter is that it uses random useragents, but that is counteracted by the supreme stupidity of not correctly url encoding the post data for the captcha solution and server name.

So , we shoulnd't use it?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So , we shoulnd't use it?

 

No if you want to use it efficiently, no.

 

 

Also what he's saying is it would be very difficult for you to even find proxies that work, as you people are stupid and will google "PROXIES" and try use those ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...