- 0
-
Posts
-
By sellerking · Posted
TG Support: https://t.me/buyingproxysup | Channel: https://t.me/buyingproxycom Discord support: #buyingproxy | Server: Join the BuyingProxy Discord Server! Create your free account here -
-
I think you should check the video more carefully you missing something very important 😛 -
.thumb.png.b8c670f34de56a5b725691b17807071d.png)
Im responding to an anonymous account with 3 posts, almost no background, and practically zero useful information added to the discussion. On top of that, the topic title is misleading calling it "Lucera Source Code" gives a completely different impression from what is actually being presented. I didn’t say anything different. Therefore, I have no clue how his process produces the same desirable result. And here you are creating drama. Your topic title clearly says "Lucera Source Code," which is not actually the case, or at least that’s how it looked when I first clicked on it, so I don’t think I was completely off. There’s also no significant information about your process like what difficulties you faced, what tools you used, or anything else meaningful. Yet you still expect others to provide value based on what? I’m not talking about your project itself which, by the way, good job. I’m talking about the topic itself as a source of value for this forum, because right now it doesn’t really offer much in that regard. So regarding the semantics, yes, wording does matter. -
You are funny guy! 😄 😄 😄 I was working with Lucera long before “AI apps” became fashionable. This was not something I generated in one day with a prompt. It took me years of work, testing, debugging and fixing broken decompiled code. Of course a decompiled source is not the original private repository with the original comments, history and developer structure. Nobody said it is the same Git repository. But saying it is only “guesses” is also wrong. When you decompile, rebuild, fix thousands of compile/runtime issues, restore broken logic, reconnect scripts, fix bad casts, repair database calls, compile it again and run it in-game, at that point it is no longer just a guess. It becomes a working reconstructed source base! The important part is not whether it is byte-for-byte identical to the original private source. The important part is that I can now work directly inside the code, change core logic, rebuild scripts, fix bugs and continue development without being locked behind closed binaries. Does it compile? Yes. Does it run in-game? Yes. Can I modify core systems directly? Yes. Can I continue development independently? Yes. So call it reconstructed, decompiled, cleaned, restored or whatever name you prefer. The result is still the same: I have a working source environment that gives me control over the lucera2 project. And that was exactly the goal! 🙂
-
-
Topics
-
Question
xdem
Gia sas Maxcheaters!
Eftiaksa afto to topic gia na sas rotiso pos 9a mporousa na 3anakano compile ton server pou exo idi etimo...
Otan ton eftiaxna proti fora ta ekana ola sosta simfona me to topic apo ton Papaditsa http://maxcheaters.com/forum/index.php?topic=145109.0 . ola ta ekana sosta kai ton efxaristo para poli.
Otan teliosa me to Eclipse, kai ta pack mou itane etima arxisa na asxoloume poli me ton server. To mono pou xriazome eine na ma9w pos 9a mporeso na ton 3anavalo sto compile gia na epe3ergasto tous kodikes tou.
Ta mona arxia pou exo sxetika me ton server mou eine ta:
kai ta periexomena afton
Kai episis oti iparxei stin navicat!
Epomenos 9a i9ela na diefkrinisw oti o server mou litourgei telia, xoris kanena provlima. To cmd tou to gameserver.bat dn mou vgazei oute ena provlima!
Exw kanei poli doulia me ta Stats ton item/skill kai tis diafores multisell kai dn 9elo na paei xameni!
e3igiste mou sas parakalo pos 9a kano compile to pack mou afto ean afto ine dinaton.
Efxaristo :)
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts