Jump to content

[Discuss]Archers & Daggers|| Heavy or Light?


Reptant_

Heavy or Light?  

121 members have voted

  1. 1. Heavy or Light?

    • Heavy
      10
    • Light
      111


Recommended Posts

Light Offcourse...

Majestic is the Best but no Attributes :-/

I suggest Dynasty Light for Dagger Classes

Both armors give resists + CON

topic is mostly done for IL

in Freya,i have tried heavy elegia,and since it gives +500 pdef comparing to light,and Freya is mostly for skills it was good

 

Using Dynasty in a Freya server,is pointless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both armors give resists + CON

topic is mostly done for IL

in Freya,i have tried heavy elegia,and since it gives +500 pdef comparing to light,and Freya is mostly for skills it was good

 

Using Dynasty in a Freya server,is pointless

 

Alright for Interlude i Suggest Majestic Leather Armor

With Dyes : +4 DEX -4 STR , +1 DEX -1 STR , +4 WIT -4 INT ( WIT gives you resistance to Hold, resistance to curses )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are playing in a server/chronicle were light users wearing heavy does not give you penalty, then if you are an archer, yeah go for heavy! Your evasion goes down, but you win a lot more p.def. But if you are a dagger, evasion >>> p.def most of the times, especially against archer! Light+ water song + evasion buff ==

 

Archer: Pew Pew Pew ---> --->  ---->

Dagger: Avoid, Avoid, Avoid. AHAH

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archer with heavy?that's the point of it lol

Heavy + no zerk=saks

Heavy +zerk=Worse stats than light

 

No way of Playing with a Dagger or a Range Class with heavy...

This is really noobie thought

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are playing in a server/chronicle were light users wearing heavy does not give you penalty, then if you are an archer, yeah go for heavy! Your evasion goes down, but you win a lot more p.def. But if you are a dagger, evasion >>> p.def most of the times, especially against archer! Light+ water song + evasion buff ==

 

Archer: Pew Pew Pew ---> --->  ---->

Dagger: Avoid, Avoid, Avoid. AHAH

:)

trust me you need ev on archer too.Think this u have a pt with 1 cat+2 bishops+6 GS .you go party vs party.u give cat buff and all of the archers give UE bishops makes celestial.who will stop them?pew pew ,you carefully knock an arrow ,missed missed,OMG why so much missed,evasion....maiby if they have a TH or GH in party they make Evasion buble from th/gh and they will have 190 evasion(on IL OFF server).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

trust me you need ev on archer too.Think this u have a pt with 1 cat+2 bishops+6 GS .you go party vs party.u give cat buff and all of the archers give UE bishops makes celestial.who will stop them?pew pew ,you carefully knock an arrow ,missed missed,OMG why so much missed,evasion....maiby if they have a TH or GH in party they make Evasion buble from th/gh and they will have 190 evasion(on IL OFF server).

 

+1 To this Absolutely Right!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if server archers / dagger can use Heavy .. use it  ,, it will be better than Draconic

not always.. we already said that draconic is better for evasion.. so an archer with heavy vs an archer with light can easily win cause of his evasion, the one with heavy will almost miss the one with light every time especially if he is on ue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

not always.. we already said that draconic is better for evasion.. so an archer with heavy vs an archer with light can easily win cause of his evasion, the one with heavy will almost miss the one with light every time especially if he is on ue

Not UE,just a bit moving to gain the +6 evasion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not UE,just a bit moving to gain the +6 evasion

oh soz, i thought wasn't necessarily to tell him that moving on archer on pvps is important..

is like when u walk, u don't think to move ur legs forward, they just move

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I got an error and not loading.   Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/sun/awt/AWTUtilities         at g3deditor.swing.Splash.<init>(Splash.java:62)         at g3deditor.G3DEditor.main(G3DEditor.java:46) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.sun.awt.AWTUtilities         at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:641)         at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:188)         at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:520)         ... 2 more Press any key to continue . . .
    • TL;DR: I'm looking for DDF files compatible with the Lineage 2 classic client (Protocol 110). If anyone has them or knows where to find them, please PM me. I'm willing to pay for them. FULL POST: Hey everyone, I'm currently working on modifying some files for Lineage 2 (specifically for Classic client, Protocol 110), and I'm in need of the appropriate DDF files to disassemble and work with files like properly EnchantedWeaponFlowEffectData_Classic.dat and others. I've been running into parsing errors with my current definitions, and it's becoming clear that having the correct DDFs for the Protocol 110 version would make this whole process much smoother.   Here's what I've tried so far: Manual Creation of DDF Files: I attempted to create my own DDF files based on other data definitions, such as those for armour and weapon groups. Unfortunately, I keep encountering file scan errors at specific rows, particularly involving fields such as Range_1_3 and MeshID_1,etc. Adjusting the data types and making fields optional did not solve the issues. Consulted Similar Files: I reviewed and compared other available DDF files, such as those for armour and weapons, trying to match similar structures, but the parsing errors persist. There might be subtle differences in how the data is structured for Protocol 110. Tried Different Data Types: I've experimented with different data types (e.g., UINT, FLOAT, HEX) for the problematic fields, but none of these changes have worked consistently across all rows.   If anyone here has the DDF files for Protocol 110 or knows a good source where I could find them, I would greatly appreciate it. Alternatively, I'm all ears if anyone has tips or tools that might help generate or reverse-engineer these DDFs effectively.   Thanks in advance for any help you can provide!
    • I’ve been using https://www.crawlspider.com for internal link management on my own projects, and it’s been a huge help in making sure important pages don’t get buried. Well, it just might be something to check out, especially if you’re looking to add more value for clients by boosting their on-page SEO.
    • - High quality and strong Business Manager ready to use.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...