Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If U have to use snipe in the throne room then I suggest to make 3prof and get archery . >_> About defending . If some parties are pushin U into , U are  standing on snipe and just wait till U get owned? Bad tactic imo .

 

Not really, That extra time gives you enough time to kill a few enemies before they get in range to attack you.

Posted

Not really, That extra time gives you enough time to kill a few enemies before they get in range to attack you.

If U are standin on walls I can just go near "target cannot be found" zone ;d It's no problem imo .
Posted

A full HE party with some healers is a bit stupid. All archer parties need counter rapid shot from SR (: and if it's possible any trickster using Real Target and Decoy. That should be a win party.

 

Agree.

 

U cant have a full party of the same archer class coz its stupid.

 

U need some other classes for suport and passives. (Like u said counter rapid shot and trickster)

 

Mi siege party is almost always like this: (i play GH)

 

2 GH/1 HE/1 SR/1 WK/1 BD/1 BP/1 EE/1 Trickster (maybe change trickster for sws)

Posted

Archer with full buff at siege will pwn also pr he can hit so far

 

So best archer at siege is pr with full buffs :)

 

Agree with you, pr is the best archer for me... He have many self buffs, rapid shot... VERY FAST. So I prefer pr.

Posted

Agree with you, pr is the best archer for me... He have many self buffs, rapid shot... VERY FAST. So I prefer pr.

everyone archers have self buffs :) but pr full buffed maybe with rb juwe is unstoppable dmg machine :)
Posted

Agree with you, pr is the best archer for me... He have many self buffs, rapid shot... VERY FAST. So I prefer pr.

 

lol, all archers have rapid shot...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..