Jump to content
MaxCheaters Official Group on Discord
Top.MaxCheaters.com is now OPEN – Lineage 2 Top Listing

[Latest Preview]L2-Overdose -=Coming Really Soon=-

RevengerInazuma
 Share

Recommended Posts

Intrepid Newbie

Intrepid

Posted
Posted

Server is almost done.

Now the last thing is to earn the money :)

 

thats why all of your and many other guys attempt is a failure...

 

L2 is a failure if you do a crappy server for 2-3 weeks in order to get money...

Vkouk Newbie

Vkouk

Posted
Posted

thats why all of your and many other guys attempt is a failure...

 

L2 is a failure if you do a crappy server for 2-3 weeks in order to get money...

actually we must talk with other guys for money,to add them at paypal and take pc,domain and webhosting

we dont want to take it up for 2-3 weeks this is really shit,and the last thing we want is the money..

Intrepid Newbie

Intrepid

Posted
Posted

actually we must talk with other guys for money,to add them at paypal and take pc,domain and webhosting

we dont want to take it up for 2-3 weeks this is really shit,and the last thing we want is the money..

 

than you just phrased it bad

MiraDBZ Newbie

MiraDBZ

Posted
Posted

Seems nice. But remove that stupid pvp color system. It's annoying when you see people killing bots or their friends for just one damn color. Also why Interlude? =/

Fortuna Newbie

Fortuna

Posted
Posted

Seems nice. But remove that stupid pvp color system. It's annoying when you see people killing bots or their friends for just one damn color. Also why Interlude? =/

 

+1 to both points ;p

Furiosus Newbie

Furiosus

Posted
Posted

Seems nice. But remove that stupid pvp color system. It's annoying when you see people killing bots or their friends for just one damn color. Also why Interlude? =/

Well, there are some pros and cons of that pvp color system. For instance, it can impel even the beginners to pvp with others. Regarding the Interlude, it might be the best choice.

MiraDBZ Newbie

MiraDBZ

Posted
Posted

Well, there are some pros and cons of that pvp color system. For instance, it can impel even the beginners to pvp with others.

 

I've experienced it and it never works as it should. It's a nice idea but kids fuck it up.

 

 

 

Phoenix4 Newbie

Phoenix4

Posted
Posted

Seems nice. But remove that stupid pvp color system. It's annoying when you see people killing bots or their friends for just one damn color. Also why Interlude? =/

 

indeed

RєVєnGeR^ Newbie

RєVєnGeR^

Posted
Posted

seriously dude you should change your server's name from L2 OverDose to L2 OpenClose, Jesus you re-re-re-re-re-opend your server 3-4 times !

actually 3 and 3rd wasn't even mine =/

and 2nd , SeeYa was the one that did the shit =)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • prostsmm
      Boost Your SEO with Rankopti – Premium Backlinks, Keywords

      By prostsmm · Posted

      NEW UPDATES ! 
    • NeoPacket0041
      HQ Photoshop | Verify Accs KYC, AML | Antiban 100% | PSD Tem

      By NeoPacket0041 · Posted

      LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • Ave
      ⚜ Custom UPDATER / LAUNCHER ⚜

      By Ave · Posted

      IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • Databay
      █ 7,000,000+ RESIDENTIAL PROXIES ✅ FROM 0.65$ / GB █

      By Databay · Posted

      This is a bump: https://databay.com/
    • sandeagle
      CliExt.dll from Guytis IL Projects problem!!!

      By sandeagle · Posted

      i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..