Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You don't know a shit about PS. So don't try to prove me wrong. What is the point of telling me that it is a good bg and a good lightning? Where do you see the nice background? Where do you see the good lightning? Especially in the final version. This is a signature I DONT like. Goddess has made way better signatures than this.

P.S.: I didn't made this i only took that and tried some effects. Couldn't change much cause it was image applied lots times.

Posted

You don't know a shit about PS. So don't try to prove me wrong. What is the point of telling me that it is a good bg and a good lightning? Where do you see the nice background? Where do you see the good lightning? Especially in the final version. This is a signature I DONT like. Goddess has made way better signatures than this.

 

the only reason you know.. that i dont know, is cuz i told you.. so maybe i lied or didnt wanna be exposed, or whats even more probable.. i didnt wanna deal with you. So to answer your question.. lemme ask you.. what dont you like about it? then take your answer and change all not like to like and youll get my answer -.- seriously if you spam i wish youd at least know how to use logic, tho spam itself isnt logical.

 

anyway.. why are you still spaming and now even going away from the theme we were on before.. which is.. why do you still spam? im sure if i talk to maxtor hell give you +1k posts just to stfu and do your rep a favor lol.

 

Anya makes nice sigs and you make shit spam after.. thats all there is to it and no its not your opinion.. at a certain point it becomes spam.

Posted

the only reason you know.. that i dont know, is cuz i told you.. so maybe i lied or didnt wanna be exposed, or whats even more probable.. i didnt wanna deal with you. So to answer your question.. lemme ask you.. what dont you like about it? then take your answer and change all not like to like and youll get my answer -.- seriously if you spam i wish youd at least know how to use logic, tho spam itself isnt logical.

 

anyway.. why are you still spaming and now even going away from the theme we were on before.. which is.. why do you still spam? im sure if i talk to maxtor hell give you +1k posts just to stfu and do your rep a favor lol.

 

Anya makes nice sigs and you make shit spam after.. thats all there is to it and no its not your opinion.. at a certain point it becomes spam.

 

You idiot in every post that you quote me you say that i spam. I am not in a need of posts and if you were a little bit smart you'd notice that there is no post count in here. Do you think that your replies to me aren't spam replies? Oh they are, but i haven't told you anything, have i? No, so stop that shit with the spam replies of mine.

 

 

 

Posted

You idiot in every post that you quote me you say that i spam. I am not in a need of posts and if you were a little bit smart you'd notice that there is no post count in here. Do you think that your replies to me aren't spam replies? Oh they are, but i haven't told you anything, have i? No, so stop that shit with the spam replies of mine.

 

I believe you will deserve -1 karma for that "idiot" lol.. since you care for your acc so much.

 

Anyway lol'd, if you were a lil bit smarter, youd notice that your replys are spam because of their content and dont depend on the section they are posted in rofl.. and ofc my replys are spam.. they are replys to spam? omg.. you crack me up lol, how retarded must you be to still not get it.. stop spamming anya's posts with crap and i will to, i mean.. we do have freedom of speech dont we? =)

 

*retarded - not an insult in this case, since it literary means slow or held back.. which you obviously are with needing this much extra explanations.. ^^

Posted

I believe you will deserve -1 karma for that "idiot" lol.. since you care for your acc so much.

 

Anyway lol'd, if you were a lil bit smarter, youd notice that your replys are spam because of their content and dont depend on the section they are posted in rofl.. and ofc my replys are spam.. they are replys to spam? omg.. you crack me up lol, how retarded must you be to still not get it.. stop spamming anya's posts with crap and i will to, i mean.. we do have freedom of speech dont we? =)

 

*retarded - not an insult in this case, since it literary means slow or held back.. which you obviously are with needing this much extra explanations.. ^^

 

Oh you got offended huh?

 

Anyway I stop it here. It is a waste of time talking to you. And the next time you quote a post of mine, remember that you are the one who started.

Posted

Come on, stop the catfights..

Rate the sig and stop those tries to prove who's wrong.

 

fail.

 

It is so annoying. In every sig of Goddess you see newname3 commenting and saying "oh what a nice sig" and stuff like that. It is so obvious that Goddess tells him to post a positive comment. That is really stupid. And what is more stupid than this is the fact that he quotes every post of mine trying to prove my ratings wrong. Wouldn't that annoy you?

Posted

It is so annoying. In every sig of Goddess you see newname3 commenting and saying "oh what a nice sig" and stuff like that. It is so obvious that Goddess tells him to post a positive comment. That is really stupid. And what is more stupid than this is the fact that he quotes every post of mine trying to prove my ratings wrong. Wouldn't that annoy you?

 

No.

If he really is stupid, then I would just leave him cry.

You see, trying to prove to a stupid guy that he is stupid, makes you stupid too.

Posted

No.

If he really is stupid, then I would just leave him cry.

You see, trying to prove to a stupid guy that he is stupid, makes you stupid too.

 

You know something? You are right. I am not going to waste my time with people like him ever again. Delete my replies please.

Posted

You know something? You are right. I am not going to waste my time with people like him ever again. Delete my replies please.

 

GRatz for promo nabby =] xD SPAM TEAM YO

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
    • GoldRush launches tomorrow! July 18 16:00 GMT+3 Europe / International Register your account in the website, connect wallet and be ready to dominate!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..