Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As I figured, the password encryptation has not been cracked yet, thats bad. Because the method of saving the encrypted passwrods to edit the l2w packets is not very good..... You need to do it for every account.... :S

 

But the script is good, I never though that it was posible to make a script that does the process of saving and loading automatically xD Cool, great job.

If i want to use OOG on DNet i need to block the packet with the ID "00" (fromclient) and send one i have captured with l2phx (for exemple)?

Posted

I still don't understand why people use PHX over PPC

I never used ppc before and i only know l2phx variables (and the source code is public i am "learning" Delphy with it ^^)

Posted

Somehow WP doesn't work for me, it doesn't let me login while using it. Weird. Trying to figure it out... :/

If you have logs in the minilogs tab, the only think I can think of would be that you have an Outgoing proxy set (you must not). That's the last sun. Keep it off (not needed for this)

 

If you do not have logs, then your client is not getting proxied. Do you have logs in miniproxy?

 

Another possible issue would be a mistyped script. If PPC fails to compile the script for a connection, it drops the connection.

runtime compile errors show in proxy PC window -> Links online tab -> Syslog

 

in case of a compile error you would get connection logs tho in the minilog panel.

Posted

You see logs in miniproxy, then your connection is getting proxied. The fact you see no log in WP probably means your port in the proxy client(miniproxy) doesn't match the listening port on WP? If you keep defaults, both should be 1777.

 

The miniproxy IP has to stay 127.0.0.1 as this is a loopback connection.

Posted

Oh, both must be the same. Then there's the error. Miniproxer is 1778 and WP is 1777 I think, 2 processes can't listen on same port at the same time, that's why I never tried to put both listening at the same port, unless only one is listening and the other just communicates with the other process without using listening... that's tcp/ip..

It is set for localhost already, but I think it was on port 1778 for MP. I'll try to figure it out later on as I'm at work atm, thanks for your help. :D

Posted

Oh, both must be the same. Then there's the error. Miniproxer is 1778 and WP is 1777 I think, 2 processes can't listen on same port at the same time, that's why I never tried to put both listening at the same port, unless only one is listening and the other just communicates with the other process without using listening... that's tcp/ip..

It is set for localhost already, but I think it was on port 1778 for MP. I'll try to figure it out later on as I'm at work atm, thanks for your help. :D

A proxy client doesn't listen on an IP, it hooks the TCP connection and sends the packets to the specified outgoing IP/port combination.

 

Only the server listens on an IP.

Posted

I know, L2 is the proxy client, but I thought MP was a proxy server, but it's not, WP is the server...

Yeah, but I never knew miniproxer is not a proxy server. I had no idea what it was for, you're right, it's a TCP hooker. I was wondering how it was doing to hijack L2 packets if I never configured anything on L2. Now I know. ^^

Everything makes sense now. I always knew WP was powerful but never figured out how it really worked.

Thanks again, gonna try it later on.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • try this one instead. The one he shared affects every single NPC/player character in the game, the one I posted only affects player characters  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UtccbD9e50x3WEnQBab2PTZnBHwpcGYM/view?usp=sharing or perhaps i misunderstood; if you could please post a full explanation of the problem you're having with the files, unfortunately i think whatever you're using to translate to english is a bit bad
    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..