Jump to content

[GR]Vote Intel OR AMD??????


Well....Intel or AMD?????  

107 members have voted

  1. 1. Well....Intel or AMD?????

    • Intel
      58
    • AMD
      49


Recommended Posts

Posted
amd is a copy of of intel but more cheapier

 

Oh, how much you people don't know..

First of all, amd & intel where one company, then suddenly intel decided to break the contract & had to repay amd with lots & lots of millions..(stupid huh ?)

Secondly, amd technology was used to make the core i7 that many of you seem to admire, during the exhibition of the new nehalem (i7) intel employer said that himself..

 

So.. make up your minds and read before you decide..

Posted

AMD 4 WIN ! Bale AMD gia na exeis tis kaliteres epidosis.Kantou sosto OverClocking kai 8a piasi 5 ghz sta sigoura...ama exeis @@ kai perisotero.AMD > Epidosis+Ftines .Intel = Epidosis+Panakribres .Ego sou lew na pareis AMD...edw kai 2 xronia me tin AMD zw...

Posted

egw ekana ena topic kai mou eipa oloi na balw AMD epeksergasti einai kaliteros!

kai twra to exw to pc edw kai 3 meres den exei pathei tpt  ::)

 

epomenos AMD  ;)

epeidi to exeis 3 meres k dn epa8e tpt xairesai? Lol ;D

Posted

egw ekana ena topic kai mou eipa oloi na balw AMD epeksergasti einai kaliteros!

kai twra to exw to pc edw kai 3 meres den exei pathei tpt  ::)

 

epomenos AMD  ;)

ai kala

exw enan mina intel kai den epa9e tpt e kai?

Posted

egw ekana ena topic kai mou eipa oloi na balw AMD epeksergasti einai kaliteros!

kai twra to exw to pc edw kai 3 meres den exei pathei tpt  ::)

 

epomenos AMD  ;)

afto eleipe re file na s eixe pathei kai kati meta apo 3 meres :P

Posted

afto eleipe re file na s eixe pathei kai kati meta apo 3 meres :P

E tote re file an pernei kapios pc prp na t xalaei se 3 meres?t pc einai auta

texnologia reeeeee

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • try this one instead. The one he shared affects every single NPC/player character in the game, the one I posted only affects player characters  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UtccbD9e50x3WEnQBab2PTZnBHwpcGYM/view?usp=sharing or perhaps i misunderstood; if you could please post a full explanation of the problem you're having with the files, unfortunately i think whatever you're using to translate to english is a bit bad nevermind, i got what you mean, here's the fix   https://drive.google.com/file/d/1av7OHaGSdnVQtcBgb9MhtiIkxVXy3P2y/view?usp=sharing   CanIngnoreCollision=True CanBeIngnoredCollision=True  
    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..