Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

does this exploit work on c4 servers?

 

Test your self ;) Btw it is a nice "trick" like to turn pink(flaged) on c2 - c3 servers... You hit and make shop like"SoulBow+16 - 1adena, and another guy will click and he will hit you). If it trick is working, soon ncsoft will fix it. :P

Posted

when u hit other person by summon u will be pink and this person dont be pk if he kill summon so i dont think so that this can work...

 

For some weird reason the damage the reflect dmg gives back travels back into time and hits before the summon actually become purple, this way you PK the summon because of the dmg the summon hits you for..

Posted

when u hit other person by summon u will be pink and this person dont be pk if he kill summon so i dont think so that this can work...

 

nope

the hitted person gonna be a pk(on dragon network,100% sure)

Posted

works in the c4off retail??

 

Pff, It not matters if your server is c4/c5/interlude... how you can see(I guess).. It you use buff reflecte damage on another person and you hit with summon.. -.-" Read all topic before post.

Posted

This exploit is still working at DN server, just wanted to update for people to know

yes, but you can be banned if there is any report with good proofs!!!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • how do I make it so that you only deal damage to a mob if you have the right items equipped, like jewels, belt, underwear, bracelet, so if you don't have one of those items equipped, you don't deal any damage to the mob thanks
    • I always welcome bug reports and never ban ppl - until proven leaker - not sure where the "arrogant" part comes from, I would like to know what exactly let you think that (quote me please, and not 12y old quotes as the other frog meme dude). I request bug reports to be properly detailed, otherwise it's a waste of time. Other than that, I don't see where I have been arrogant. I got proper discussions with many ppl, not sure why you wouldn't be one of them.   I got 76 bug reports in my list (21 on forums, 55 on gitlab).   I have a single bug report regarding lvl 4 clan quest, which has to be tested since it's not even clear about what is supposed to be broken. Seven Signs was never reworked and is basically L2J based (we got a rework branch to test/commit with reworked AIs). Geoengine got no specific issues (at my knowledge), pathfinding was reworked lately to be way more performant, and I still try to improve performance using some pool system. Movement was partially fixed in latest 410, and probably will get another rework soon (notably reverting to the task wallclock).   "I" surely didn't spend 12y over geoengine - Hasha cared about geoengine during rev 334 / 354 / 390 / 395 and 397. It is solely his work, and always tagged as it. He was rewarded with money for his work, and almost a decade of aCis access.   aCis is a community work, things tagged with Tryskell is my work, the leftover is someone else work. 22 ppl worked as developers in this project over 14 years.   I would gladly accept whatever list of fixes/reports you have to share. You will even be rewarded (you probably know about cookie system), as anyone else sharing bug report or fixes.   My main concerns lately is the lack of decent L2OFF IL data, it is my main bottleneck actually. If you're aware about decent L2OFF data to parse, let me know.   Eventually reach me over Discord to speak, I don't want to continue the offtopic over that help request.
    • Your project doesn't compare to aCis; you have to be an idiot to use that. I know someone who bought the High Five "PREMIUM" version, which has the same bugs as the free version. If you want, I can share his latest premium version. Players are going through walls with their bad geoengine, falling under the Olympiad. If you want, I can record and prove what I'm saying. The aCis project is 50 steps ahead of yours and it's not even stable...
    • l2jteon, l2joneo l2jscoria etc etc. and from that we went to this 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock