Jump to content
MaxCheaters Official Group on Discord
Top.MaxCheaters.com is now OPEN – Lineage 2 Top Listing
L2JForge.live Interlude Premium Emulator

[Rate] Newbie Sigs :S

mVecAtoR

By mVecAtoR
in Graphics/GFX Showcase

 Share

Recommended Posts

mVecAtoR Newbie

mVecAtoR

Posted
Posted

It is the first time that I make signatures :P (except that I made before 3 years ;D)

Rate them

All comments accepted I give a 3/10

 

2yn46jb.jpg

2gsl3px.jpg

 

Ps. I didn't made them   with paint :P  

 

Bleik Newbie

Bleik

Posted
Posted

No way dude, there's no way..Come on people, what's wrong with you?You post every single shit you do in your PC in this forum?

Tell me ONLY ONE SERIOUS clue that makes these 2 "pictures" signatures...Oh God..

Coyote™ Newbie

Coyote™

Posted
Posted

i like em but u need some more practice

 

Can you please tell us wtf you like on these?

When rating something, give REASONS or make COMMENTS.

 

By telling "nice man" or "7/10" you are SPAMMING.

 

Jesus.

mg13gr Newbie

mg13gr

Posted
Posted

Oh stfu all of you.

 

I remember myself making similar images, so?? Also, I am pretty sure that all of you at first you made similar creations, didn't you? Or your first sig was a masterpiece?

You can just be kind and give your advice.

He has already mentioned that he is newbie.

Also, nobody forced you to see it and please don't tell me that you adviced them or something like that.

 

You can just leave the topic without posting, it isn's such hard, is it?

 

 

Anyway, @ HM5

 

As I have already mentioned my first creations was like these two, but with practice I can make kinda cool sigs now. Just, try hard and go pro. That's my advice.

I think you know where you should look for tutorials and so on.

 

 

Coyote™ Newbie

Coyote™

Posted
Posted

Oh stfu all of you.

 

I remember myself making similar images, so?? Also, I am pretty sure that all of you at first you made similar creations, didn't you? Or your first sig was a masterpiece?

You can just be kind and give your advice.

He has already mentioned that he is newbie.

Also, nobody forced you to see it and please don't tell me that you adviced them or something like that.

 

You can just leave the topic without posting, it isn's such hard, is it?

 

 

Anyway, @ HM5

 

As I have already mentioned my first creations was like these two, but with practice I can make kinda cool sigs now. Just, try hard and go pro. That's my advice.

I think you know where you should look for tutorials and so on.

 

 

 

Nobody told that we are all pros, or that we were never newbies.

But I think that people can judge themselves if they are normal.

 

And coming in here to post a text, is NOT normal.

And by the way, that's what you are doing as well, don't act dude.

mg13gr Newbie

mg13gr

Posted
Posted

And by the way, that's what you are doing as well, don't act dude.

Where else have I posted something similar...??

Also, yes I often post like that in topics by members like Project.

 

On the other hand, members like HM5 have never gave me a reason (aformi) to blame them.

That's all, I don't act..

Coyote™ Newbie

Coyote™

Posted
Posted

Where else have I posted something similar...??

Also, yes I often post like that in topics by members like Project.

 

On the other hand, members like HM5 have never gave me a reason (aformi) to blame them.

That's all, I don't act..

 

You know that you are telling... Anyway, I won't discuss it here.

 

 

HM5, since mister magaki wants us to "help" you, then that's what I am going to do, but in my way.

 

 

Well, first of all you can't call these tags.

These could be any kind of banners (bad though) or images for any kind of presentations.

 

In the first one, there are just too many colours that don't really match.

The borders are too fat, dunno why you made them with two colours (white & blue). Actually, it is not white and blue, but it's a lighting blending effect..

Anyway, still, it's bad.

The only thing that may be useful in the future, is this effect with the lines.

You need to improve your skills on adding borders (not a big deal), but it's good that you started so early with them.

Last but not least, the main part of the banner (I won't call this a tag) which is the text is screwed up.

The font is bad and the size is too big. Without any sub-texts it is very ugly.

 

About the second one, well you just added a ready brush or any kind of ready image as the background and then you added the text.

My rating about the text, will be the same as for the first one.

 

If I had to choose one of these, then it would be the first one.

 

 

bai bai

Furiosus Newbie

Furiosus

Posted
Posted

Oh stfu all of you.

 

I remember myself making similar images, so?? Also, I am pretty sure that all of you at first you made similar creations, didn't you? Or your first sig was a masterpiece?

You can just be kind and give your advice.

He has already mentioned that he is newbie.

Also, nobody forced you to see it and please don't tell me that you adviced them or something like that.

 

You can just leave the topic without posting, it isn's such hard, is it?

 

 

Anyway, @ HM5

 

As I have already mentioned my first creations was like these two, but with practice I can make kinda cool sigs now. Just, try hard and go pro. That's my advice.

I think you know where you should look for tutorials and so on.

 

 

I don't know why but I agree with magaki13 and he's logical! I know that posting his ''newbie'' creations seems disturbing for you, but there isn't a rule saying you can't share them.

 

Anyway, about your signatures, you have to improve your skills by reading some guides. ;)

Bleik Newbie

Bleik

Posted
Posted

Also, I am pretty sure that all of you at first you made similar creations, didn't you?

 

No, I didn't.I made way much better things even with a white BG and a render from the first time I read a tutorial.

I didn't start PS with just pressing buttons and check what the result will be.Before the first launch of PS I read a tutorial for a signature

and I made it.

Not shits like those.

 

@ Topic Creator.

 

No Offense dude but...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • aguy
      Looking for the most complete High Five server pack (2026)

      By aguy · Posted

      I have a highly customized Hi5 pack based on L2JMobius with a lot of features for performance and modern game design. Disclaimer: I do not run any public server, but I run a "private" server for a group of 10 friends and about 2000 AI bots that required me to do heavy modifications on core systems of the game.  So my opinion will obivously be biased towards L2JMobius.   What I can tell you though without bias is: Most of the features you are asking for are nowadays considered de-facto, don't pay money for them. TvT, offline mode, community boards, premiums, vote rewards are in most packs including the open source ones. So before you pay a thousand plus euro for a pack ask yourself what you are paying that money for, that open source packs don't have.   Also a lot of the "strong points" some old packs were made for are nowadays obsolete. L2JFree derived packs for example used to have a lot of GC optimizations (Trove library) which are not not maintained, but most importantly not needed cause Java has evolved a lot since then and the performance issues these tricks tried to solve back then, are currently solved by Java's JVM itself. So if someone tries to sell you packed / unpacked integers in special hashmap data structures and other such things know that they have really lost their value nowadays.    A lot of people are selling thin air, things that everyone has. "Quality geodata" being one of them. I mean what's "quality geodata" ? Has someone painted them by hand ? Hell there's an online tool for free in github that extracts quality geodata, I think Galagard made it ? In contrast I'll tell you without wanting to boast about it that I use 3D navmesh on my project because 2000 bots could not pathfind large distances on A* on geodata. As far as I know, L2JMobius has it in its subscription version too. So if I could do an acceptable transition to navmesh from geodata in a week alone, I would assume that a decent pack with dedicated developers could do it better and faster. Red flag if someone still tries to sell you geodata in 2026.   Multi-protocol support gives small value and is a high risk.   I would not go for multi-protocol support for a public server cause you are locking yourself to specific providers and the functionality they support. If you need to change (eg pricing issues), you will be locked to a handful of providers. And what are you really gaining from a new client on an old game version ? Better UI ? The engine is still the same, static targeting and menus.    Agentic AI will make old hard features easy to implement, and drop their money value. Pay for AI-proof value. And compared to what most insecure devs claim, its a very powerful tool that allows those who know how to use it to accelerate their development. So a lot of features that took in the past a lot of time and effort to be developed and were a reason to charge money, are becoming a commodity today. So think to: The thing I am paying money for right now, how easy will it be to implement in a year from now ? If for example you are paying money for a game launcher that Claude Code can generate in top 1 hour without issues, I think you are wasting money.    I want to emphasise this a lot. Software engineering is in a transition atm. Most things that were mediocre to implement, launchers, guards, CMS, are nowadays easy. Yet the dev community continues to market them as premium content. They are not, sooner or later, when everyone starts selling them, they will realize that they will have to offer value in more complex features.  Private or public ? Bottom line is that a private pack and 1000 euro wont get you a sucessful server. You're the one that make it or break it. There have been many sucessful servers both in private packs and public packs in the past. It's really on the hands of the beholder, not on the source. A pack that plays good is a good indicator to buy as Trance said, but I would disagree that it's not enough. A server owner is not a player. He's a business man and has to account for longevity, vendor lock-in, expandability, hidden costs,  amortization, price changes and many more. Don't pick a pack based on how it played only.    
    • Trance
      Looking for the most complete High Five server pack (2026)

      By Trance · Posted

      You don’t even need to look for a ghost project. Just buy the files from a project you’ve personally tested or played. That’s a much better starting point.
    • sellerking
      ⭐ buyingproxy.com | ⭐ $0.95/GB ⭐ Residential Proxies - 80M+

      By sellerking · Posted

      TG Support: https://t.me/buyingproxysup | Channel: https://t.me/buyingproxycom Discord support: #buyingproxy | Server: Join the BuyingProxy Discord Server!  Create your free account here
    • Atom
      Looking for the most complete High Five server pack (2026)

      By Atom · Posted

      You have to put deep inside your pocket for something like this, for sure 😄
    • KKorc
      Looking for the most complete High Five server pack (2026)

      By KKorc · Posted

      Hello everyone, I'm looking for a High Five Java server pack for a long-term project. I'm not looking for free packs. I'm interested in purchasing a professional pack with full source code if it's worth the investment. My priorities are: Stable core Clean and well-structured source code Good geodata and AI Modern Community Board Offline Trade / Offline Craft Premium Account system Vote Reward system Auto Events (TvT, CTF, DM, etc.) HWID protection Auto Farm  Buffer / QoL systems Modern admin tools Good Olympiad & Seven Signs implementation Excellent instance support (Freya, Frintezza, Zaken, Beleth, etc.) A huge bonus would be: Multi-protocol support (High Five + newer clients such as Salvation/Classical clients) Full source code (no closed binaries) Some custom things over Elegia At the moment I'm considering packs like Sunrise and L2-Scripts, but I'd really like to hear opinions from people who have actually worked with them. If you've been running a serious High Five project, I'd appreciate your honest feedback: Which pack are you using? What are its strengths and weaknesses? Would you buy it again? Are there any better alternatives available today? I'm looking for real experience rather than advertisements. Thanks!

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..