Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

over 12 you all make a fantastic job your team is the best !!!!!!!!!!!!

 

tytyty for your pack

 

plz if you can add some voice commads like  .join for tvt or ctf and res command !!!! i think  it will very usefull

but if it is difficult never mind that share is da best nc job congraz!!!!!!!!!!! ;D ;D ;D

Posted

@sakisd - yep dude,but now Over's checking  the critical bugs.

Wait for news,i think that soon him add new things in the pack :).

Posted

Great share! Thx.

Can You make full working Faction system without bugs?

What do I mean?=> Pls make faction system with choose of faction names in config.

+ One faction member can not invite in the party,friends, clan, alliance members of another faction.

+ One faction member can not recommend members of another faction.

Posted

compile:

    [javac] Compiling 1324 source files to E:\workspace\L2J_Core\build\classes

    [javac] E:\workspace\L2J_Core\java\net\sf\l2j\gameserver\network\clientpackets\CharacterCreate.java:103: cannot find symbol

    [javac] symbol  : variable REASON_INCORRECT_NAME

    [javac] location: class net.sf.l2j.gameserver.network.serverpackets.CharCreateFail

    [javac] sendPacket(new CharCreateFail(CharCreateFail.REASON_INCORRECT_NAME));

    [javac]                                             ^

    [javac] 1 error

 

ist the same file in l2jserver.. but in l2jserver dont this show error... can fix this plis to compile a new data

i see trac and dont show movement in 8 days... meavy l2dag ist dead like others proyect

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..