Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

hmm at the official site they say they fixed it :((((( but i managed to get it work today :D nevermind there are too much empty accs like 290000 accs and now u need luck to get an acc which has good gear cause more then the half is empty :(

Posted

No it's because they h ave added a number to the accound id's if you look in the other forum under development they have a fix for this hack.

It's to add a number to all the ids so if the number is 1000 the first (gm) account would be 1001. But we dont know what number that have added to the accounts.

Posted

get real, they added random numbers and pwnzored 99.9% of ppl (aka script kiddies) (any other server where this works is kinda lame, have fun xD)

 

what does this mean?

that account 1 can be 51651651 and account 2 985663 and so on :)

GL

Posted

i saw that fix too but thats bullshit....

look if the acc ids begin at 1 u couldnt login with this id but i can its empty but u can... i think it isnt only adding a number but something like if someone creates an acc a script creates serverside empty accs like 5 and then anotherone makes an acc and so on.. Like this:

create acc----> id 5

server makes empty accs -----> 6-10

create acc ------> id 11

dou understand???

Posted

m4rx u are wrong :D i controled it i made 2 accs immediately to check the ids they arent random :D the difference was 6 numbers only so there is a chance to break this noob fix :D

 

Edit: Sry for double post :D

Posted

There is no way there is 243547 accounts on that server, even if you deivede ethat by 6 thats 40 000 they must have added a number at the begining.

there are even more :D the highest i know is 290793 i dont think that there are so many accs but i know that there aremany empty accs :D

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • try this one instead. The one he shared affects every single NPC/player character in the game, the one I posted only affects player characters  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UtccbD9e50x3WEnQBab2PTZnBHwpcGYM/view?usp=sharing or perhaps i misunderstood; if you could please post a full explanation of the problem you're having with the files, unfortunately i think whatever you're using to translate to english is a bit bad
    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..