Jump to content

Question

Posted

Is it a bug or am I setting something wrong?
use l2jsunrise. and my premium system has the option of modifying the drop in premiums. but only works for what falls directly into the player's purse.
So far, so good. but if it falls to the ground, even if I set this part here, for x2 it does not work:

 

# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Premium Drop Configuration
# These rates will be applied to premium char if AutoLoot in Drops.ini is TRUE
# otherwise might create some exploits with pickup action
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

# General drop multiplier if item id is NOT in PrRateDropItemsById list
PremiumRateDropItems = 2


# Specific multipliers for items, if you add one items in this list will
# bypass PremiumRateDropItems
# TIP: if you have one item id in Rates.ini for example 57,20
# This rate will multiply 20 * your number here so be carefull
PrRateDropItemsById = 57,2;30007,2

 

 

Adena ID: 57

Custom Coin ID ; 30007

 

Can someone please help me?

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted (edited)

These rates will be applied to premium char if AutoLoot in Drops.ini is TRUE

otherwise might create some exploits with pickup action

 

I think the answer is right there.

Edited by FrozenWarrior
  • 0
Posted

Yes, I know.
But I want to for what to drop from the RaidBoss (On the Ground) quit according to the premium. in my case x2. Has as?

in fact I wanted it to fose like this:

PremiumRateRaidDropItems = 2

  • 0
Posted
1 hour ago, HARDECORE said:

Yes, I know.
But I want to for what to drop from the RaidBoss (On the Ground) quit according to the premium. in my case x2. Has as?

in fact I wanted it to fose like this:

PremiumRateRaidDropItems = 2

 

If there isn't a config for PremiumRateRaidDropItems you probably have to make one.

  • 0
Posted
2 minutes ago, FrozenWarrior said:

 

If there isn't a config for PremiumRateRaidDropItems you probably have to make one.

excuse me. I don't know how to program enough for this. Can you help me with this?

  • 0
Posted (edited)

I add this in L2Npc.java

	public L2ItemInstance dropItem(L2PcInstance player, int itemId, long itemCount)
	{
		L2ItemInstance item = null;
		
		for (int i = 0; i < itemCount; i++)
		{
			// Randomize drop position.
			final int newX = (getX() + Rnd.get((RANDOM_ITEM_DROP_LIMIT * 2) + 1)) - RANDOM_ITEM_DROP_LIMIT;
			final int newY = (getY() + Rnd.get((RANDOM_ITEM_DROP_LIMIT * 2) + 1)) - RANDOM_ITEM_DROP_LIMIT;
			final int newZ = getZ() + 20;
			
			if (ItemData.getInstance().getTemplate(itemId) == null)
			{
				_log.error("Item doesn't exist so cannot be dropped. Item ID: " + itemId + " Quest: " + getName());
				return null;
			}
			
+			if ((player != null) && player.isPremium())
+			{
+				itemCount *= player.calcPremiumDropMultipliers(itemId);
+			}
+			
			item = ItemData.getInstance().createItem("Loot", itemId, itemCount, player, this);
			
			if (item == null)
			{
				return null;
			}
			
			if (player != null)
			{
				item.getDropProtection().protect(player);
			}
			
			item.dropMe(this, newX, newY, newZ);
			

so the drop that is not autoloot works x2. but when you drop some herbs this happens..

 

D0fqOlY.jpg

 

Edited by HARDECORE

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • try this one instead. The one he shared affects every single NPC/player character in the game, the one I posted only affects player characters  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UtccbD9e50x3WEnQBab2PTZnBHwpcGYM/view?usp=sharing or perhaps i misunderstood; if you could please post a full explanation of the problem you're having with the files, unfortunately i think whatever you're using to translate to english is a bit bad
    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..