Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Definately @L2Trade123. The maximum enchant for armory will be +7. For weaponry it'll be +20 but I am curious to see who can pull off +16 first.

 

The enchant chance for magic weapons is brought to the same level as fighter weapons. The overall chance is slightly higher than regular since it'll be more of an effort to get an S-grade weapon since botting is not possible and we still want people to over-enchant their farmed weaponry.

 

Hope this answers your question.

Posted (edited)

We've tried all forms of botting and none worked for us. Besides our anti-bot, there are several other anti-botting solutions available such as: players being able to report bots and other solutions that I cannot go into detail about.

 

Internally we have assigned one of our staff members to maintain, examine, research and evaluate everything regarding bots and anti-botting.

 

We've put a lot of effort and thought into these systems. No system is 100% so I cannot be 100% sure but I am really confident that we've eliminated the common ways of botting. As for the other methods of botting - only time will tell.

Edited by OpalSnow
Posted

Well true no system can ensure 100% bot protection but it will be hard to bot without being suspicious I guess, so with some effort any form of botting can be eliminated. Hope it will work out. 

 

Also about that enchant thing, may I know how is that exactly in %? Is it stable or it's decreasing if u go more ++?

Posted

What time is it?! You ready? 
Cause it's TIME for our Grand Opening!

 

The launch of L2Sublimity's next server 'Destiny' will be THIS Friday 16 November at 20:00 PM GMT!

We can't remind you enough, cause we won't want you to miss it due to forgetfulness ;P.

 

By the way you also don't want to forget about our Promotion Event. Prizes are up for grabs. 
So make sure you share your personal link (find it here: https://play.l2sublimity.com) with all your friends.

 

One more time.. THIS Friday at 20:00 PM GMT. You'll find the countdown on our website https://www.l2sublimity.com/.
Be there!

Posted
9 minutes ago, Nasif said:

I dont see this server in vote sites. Ppl dont know about your server.

 

server itself famous already many people already know that server is opening from facebook pages etc.

Posted
Just now, Celestine said:

 

server itself famous already many people already know that server is opening from facebook pages etc.

yeah i know, i play the first season, but much randoms and "new" players dont know about this.

 

If it's worth ... how not to communicate it in the best way?

Posted
46 minutes ago, Nasif said:

I dont see this server in vote sites. Ppl dont know about your server.

Like Celestine said we advertise on other media. We can't create an account on L2Topzone for example, the registration is disabled. Which voting sites do you suggest? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • First of all, I never challenged you at any point.   Second, congratulations—this is what you should have done from the start: shown how it worked, how to exploit it, etc. Now, let’s look at the facts:   The flaw requires the person to be the OWNER of the castle.   It requires the use of third-party programs or a modified client—and most private servers don’t even allow the use of modified clients, thanks to their anti-cheat systems.   Are you honestly certain that a castle owner on a private server would risk losing their account just to pull off this exploit? They’d have to be a complete idiot.   You’ve spent months going on about how you discovered a bug that has ZERO impact on the actual gameplay—congratulations.   I’m not saying that flaws are bad or that they shouldn’t be fixed—in fact, the flaw *was* fixed.   What I’m saying is that you’ve been harping on the same point for months, even though the issue had already been resolved in the closed branch.   It’s the prerogative of those who maintain the code to fix things however they see fit, don’t you think?   And learn this: when you report a bug, you MUST: 1- Report the bug (obviously) 2- Explain in detail how the bug occurs 3- Prove that the bug actually happens   And instead of contributing to the project through the proper, public channels, you chose to turn this into a whole circus—I’d just like to understand why...   It’s a good thing everyone in this thread will get to see who the "asshole" is.
    • To use this exploit you have to:   1) Have access to the castle vault, aka you have to own a castle. 2) Send through Adrenaline Engine.BypassToServer(Bypass) as emommy said 3) In the crafted packet you will put a negative amount eg -100000000 What this does is it multiplies it by -1 so it becomes positive. 4) You won't see anything in your inventory, but if you open the castle vault through the Chamberlain you will see that the warehouse now has 10000000 adena. The negative became positive. 5) Withdraw the adena normally and you now have all the adena you need.   I wouldn't bother explaining how to do it, but this idiot (Galagard) wanted to challenge me. And from what I can see, they haven't patched the exploit even if I reported it to them a week ago so it's obvious that people will start sharing it around.   Maybe I should start positing here instead of the official channels.   All public versions of L2JMobius for all chronicles are vulnerable and not patched yet.   And thanks to this idiot (Galagard), everyone now knows.   Baldurian. EDIT:    Ok I just got informed that Mobius decided to accept the fix in the public repo.   So I will now post a proof of the exploit as Galagard requested. Normally I don't do so, but my good friend Galagard who has his nose so far stuck up his asshole, insulted me, and challenged me to show proof:     And to be fair to everyone, this is not an L2JMobius issue as the thread claims. It's L2JServer leftover, so if you have L2JServer derivative packs, you should patch too. 
    • Already fixed in subscriber version, but this bug report is classified as "Invalid" because since the author did not explain the method in detail, the validation flaw does indeed exist—but that alone does not prove it is possible to duplicate adena or any other item by exploiting said flaw. It looks like yet another AI hallucinating a vulnerability, then deducing that it could be used to exploit a different vulnerability. No have proofs in video or a detailed way to reproduce the potential failure Go find something else to do, Baldurian; you don’t even know how to exploit the flaw you reported yourself.
    • Interface sources for P196 (Secret of Empire 2 or aka Fafurion) for Main/Classic. This protocol is commonly used for classic interlude. You can use the xdat editors which support this protocol from my other shares.   NWindow + Interface UC + L2Editor Compiler   Download  
    • Interface sources for P166 (Secret of Empire 1) for Main/Classic. This protocol is commonly used for classic interlude. You can use the xdat editors which support this protocol from my other shares.   NWindow + Interface UC + L2Editor Compiler   Download  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..